Judgments - Work Contract

Law laid down - The peon and salesman etc. appointed in country/foreign liquor shops run by the excise department and were terminated 4-5 years thereafter on account of the subsequent change in policy to auction such shops, are not entitled to regularization/absorption in government service as they do not fulfill the requisite conditions contained in the scheme dated 16/5/2007 framed by the State government on the basis of the judgment of the supreme court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Full Judgment

Tags Tenders Work Contract

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PRENIT WORLD LLP Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

W.P.(C), 4443 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 21, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders Work Contract

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SUNFLAG IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

WRIT PETITION, 11068 of 2018, Judgment Date: May 18, 2018

Law Laid Down - In absence of any averment by the petitioner in respect of completion of stage of third sub-menu (Attach Documents); the attaching documents and/or the bid acknowledgment not received from the system as per the tender conditions, it cannot be said that the decision to declare that the petitioner did not submit technical bid online lacks bona fide. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered Full Judgment

Tags Tenders Work Contract

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M.P. POWER MANAGEMENT COMPANY LTD. Versus RENEW CLEAN ENERGY PVT. LTD. & ANR

Appeal (Civil), 3600 of 2018, Judgment Date: Apr 05, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Work Contract

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, UJJAIN & ANR. Versus BVG INDIA LIMITED AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 3330 of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 27, 2018

Full Judgment

Tags Work Contract

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. M/s Optel Telecommunication Ltd

AA, 22 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 08, 2018

Law Laid down - The learned Arbitrator is bound by the terms of Agreement. Therefore, an award rendered by such an arbitrator cannot be sustained if an Arbitrator has traveled beyond the terms of the agreement to hold that there was an oral agreement prior to placing of Advance Purchase Order, which was accepted by the respondents. The terms of the contract stand crystallized with the issuance of Advance Purchase Order and acceptance of the same. The Arbitral Tribunal has to take Full Judgment

Tags Tenders Work Contract

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)