Judgments - Ultra Virus
STATE OF MEGHALAYA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Madhya Pradesh High Court Advocates Bar Association and Anr. Versus Union of India and Anr.
Laxmikant Sharma and Ors Vs. The State Of Bihar and Ors
UNION OF INDIA VERSUS RAJENDRA N SHAH & ANR.
SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) Versus Union of India and others
VIKAS KISHANRAO GAWALI VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
PARMAR SAMANTSINH UMEDSINH VS. STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
GAJENDRA SHARMA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
Sk. Md. Rafique VERSUS Managing Committee, Contai Rahamania High Madrasah and Others
M/S BHAWANI TEA INDUSTRIES VS STATE OF ASSAM & ORS
VIVEK NARAYAN SHARMA Vs. UNION OF INDIA
Whether the notification dated 8th November 2016 is ultra vires Section 26(2) and Sections 7,17,23,24,29 and 42 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934; Does the notification contravene the provisions of Article 300(A) of the Constitution; Assuming that the notification has been validly issued under the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 whether it is ultra vires Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution; Whether the limit on withdrawal of Full Judgment
Satyendra Pal Singh V/s State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.,Revenue And Others
R.M DHARIWAL 100% EOU Vs. U.O.I & ORS
R.B. Rai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
27. Thus, taking overall view of the matter, the existing provision relating to reservation, backlog vacancies, carryforward of backlog vacancies and the operation of roster, contained in the Rules of 2002 runs contrary to the constitutional provisions contained in clause (4A) and (4B) of Article 16 and Article 335 of the Constitution and the law predicated in M. Nagaraj (supra), are declared ultra vires and non-est in law. 28. Consequently, various promotions of SCs/STs category made on the basis of these Full Judgment
WIPRO LTD. Vs. ASST. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS & ORS.
2) The subject matter of those writ petitions/writ appeals was the constitutional validity of proviso (II-i) of Rule 9(2) of the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as the "Valuation Rules"). 36) We are, therefore, of the opinion that impugned amendment, namely, proviso Full Judgment
SHREYA SINGHAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises very important and far-reaching questions relatable primarily to the fundamental right of free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. 119. Full Judgment
S.T. SADIQ Vs. STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
It is well-settled that if a statute requires an authority to exercise power, when such authority is satisfied that conditions exist for exercise of that power, the satisfaction has to be based on the existence of grounds mentioned in the statute. The grounds must be made out on the basis of the relevant material. If the existence of the conditions required for the exercise of the power is challenged, the courts Full Judgment