Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Ku. Shiva Bhadoriya Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Appeal, 6664 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 12, 2022

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Birendra Kumar Vs. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Civil Writ, 5376 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 25, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. Versus PHULPARI KUMARI

Appeal (Civil), 8782 of 2019, Judgment Date: Dec 06, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CHAITANYA PRAKASH AUDICHYA Vs. CBI

Appeal (Crl.), 697 of 2011, Judgment Date: Jul 01, 2015

It is further well established that where misconduct is proved, the alleged enmity between the complainant and the delinquent officer is immaterial. (See B. Hanumantha Rao v. State of A.P.[4]).   Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

D. VELAYUTHAM Vs. STATE REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

Appeal (Crl.), 787 of 2011, Judgment Date: Mar 10, 2015

He has admitted the receipt of the bribe amount. The only effort at proving his innocence has been the submission that receipt of the entire sum was on behalf of Accused 1, no part of which was demanded by Accused 2 for his own keeping and consumption. This Court has ratiocinated in significant length and detail on the nature of evidence commonly encountered in trap cases Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

C SUKUMARAN Vs. STATE OF KERALA

Appeal (Crl.), 192 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 29, 2015

It has been continuously held by this Court in a catena of cases after interpretation of the provisions of Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Act that the demand of illegal gratification by the accused is the sine qua non for constituting an offence under the provisions of the Act. In the present case, as has been rightly held by the High Court, there Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SANJAYSINH RAMRAO CHAVAN Vs. DATTATRAY GULABRAO PHALKE & ANR

Appeal (Crl.), 97 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 16, 2015

Whether the High Court is within its jurisdiction to direct the investigating officer to make a request for sanction for prosecution from the competent authority? Cognizance is taken prior to commencement of criminal proceedings. Taking of cognizance is thus a sine qua non or condition precedent for holding a valid trial. Cognizance is taken of an offence and not Full Judgment