Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Vs. M/s Optel Telecommunication Ltd

AA, 22 of 2010, Judgment Date: Mar 08, 2018

Law Laid down - The learned Arbitrator is bound by the terms of Agreement. Therefore, an award rendered by such an arbitrator cannot be sustained if an Arbitrator has traveled beyond the terms of the agreement to hold that there was an oral agreement prior to placing of Advance Purchase Order, which was accepted by the respondents. The terms of the contract stand crystallized with the issuance of Advance Purchase Order and acceptance of the same. The Arbitral Tribunal has to take Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Vishwanath Singh Vs. State of M.P. and others

WRIT PETITION, 666 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 11, 2018

Law Laid Down - S.52 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 – in absence of seizure of forest produce or its Panchanama, entire confiscation proceedings initiated in respect of vehicle cannot be allowed to sustain. Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNIMEDITREK PVT. LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

W.P.(C), 5474 of 2017, Judgment Date: Dec 01, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. VECTRA ADVANCED ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. Vs. UOI AND ANR.

W.P.(C), 8106 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 17, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SRI CHITTARANJAN MAITY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

Appeal (Civil), 15545-15546 of 2017, Judgment Date: Oct 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SANJAY M.PAWAR Vs MALEGAON MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR

FIRST APPEAL, 1768 of 2002, Judgment Date: Aug 14, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Gauhati High Court (Single Judge)

UMA PRASAD UPADHYAYA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

WP(C), 2290 of 2017, Judgment Date: Aug 07, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

ANURADHA SHARMA Vs. NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR

W.P.(C), 5790 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 12, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Gauhati High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. T&T PROJECTS LTD. VS THE STATE OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND 4 ORS.

Writ Appeal, 187 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 10, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

M/S. HARYANA CARRIERS AND ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

W.P.(C), 1504 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 03, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Mrs. Kalpana Khiwani & another Vs. Madhya Pradesh Housing & Infrastructure Development Board

WRIT PETITION, 5080 of 2014, Judgment Date: Apr 07, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Balaji Dubey Vs Bhopal Sahakari Dugdha Sangh Maryadit

WRIT PETITION, 4151 of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 21, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Vs. HBL NIFE POWER SYSTEMS LTD

Appeal (Civil), 3193 of 2006, Judgment Date: Jan 20, 2016

Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORP Vs. RAVINDER KUMAR & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 8314 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2015

Further, the High Court has failed to consider another important fact that the Government being guardian of public finance it has right to refuse the lowest or any other tender bid or bids submitted by the bidders to it provided its decision is neither arbitrary nor unreasonable as it amounts to violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The appellant- Corporation’s decision in cancelling Full Judgment

Tags Tenders
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF PUNJAB Vs. M/S. BANDEEP SINGH & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 629-630 of 2006, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India ()

NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORP. LTD. Vs. M/S ASHOK KUMAR SINGH & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 1852 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 13, 2015

-While the technical bids were opened and found compliant, the financial bids had yet to be opened when the respondents moved an application addressed to the AGM (C&M) of the appellant-corporation at Rai Bareilly withdrawing the bids submitted by it and asking for being excluded from consideration besides praying for refund of the earnest money deposited with the bids. -   -The expression "revocation of tender" does not Full Judgment