Judgments - Tenders
UTTAR PRADESH RAJKIYA NIRMAN NIGAM VERSUS EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS
DIN BANDHU DASS VERSUS DELHI TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
SUJA SUNIL VERSUS MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS AND ORS
MOHD. AHSON INFRA PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
CARETEL INFOTECH LTD Versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS
M/S ICOMM TELE LTD. VERSUS PUNJAB STATE WATER SUPPLY & SEWERAGE BOARD & ANR.
GWALIOR DISTILLERIES PVT. LTD. Versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS
M/s Jaiprakash Associates Ltd., Rewa -Versus- State of M.P. and others
M/s Som Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. vs. Excise Commissioner & Ors.
M/s Associated Alcohol & Breweries Ltd. vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
M/s Associated Alcohol & Breweries Ltd. vs. State of M.P. & Ors.
Siddhi Vinayak & Another Vs. Union of India & Others
M/s Dilip Buildcon Ltd. Vs. Ghyanshyam Das Dwivedi
Kishorilal Dubey Vs. Premchand Shrivastava (deceased) through L.Rs. Smt.Shail Shrivastava & Others
Law laid down - "Whether the benefit of Section 14(1) of the Limitation Act can be given to the respondents when the earlier suit was decided by the Court who is competent to decide the same" Held - No. “Whether when the earlier suit was decided on merits, the subsequent suit for the same relief is maintainable.” Held- No. Full Judgment
Manoj Kumar Vs. State of MP & others
Law laid down - The peon and salesman etc. appointed in country/foreign liquor shops run by the excise department and were terminated 4-5 years thereafter on account of the subsequent change in policy to auction such shops, are not entitled to regularization/absorption in government service as they do not fulfill the requisite conditions contained in the scheme dated 16/5/2007 framed by the State government on the basis of the judgment of the supreme court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and Full Judgment
PRENIT WORLD LLP Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
SUNFLAG IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Law Laid Down - In absence of any averment by the petitioner in respect of completion of stage of third sub-menu (Attach Documents); the attaching documents and/or the bid acknowledgment not received from the system as per the tender conditions, it cannot be said that the decision to declare that the petitioner did not submit technical bid online lacks bona fide. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered Full Judgment
M/s Goel Roadways Vs. State of M.P. & Another
Law Laid Down - The argument of the petitioner that the respondent could pick and choose a particular property to assess the net worth of the tenderer is not acceptable as the respondents cannot resort to such method to assess the net worth of the tenderer. The decision taken by the Technical Evaluation and Tender Approval Committee, which is a committee of experts cannot be interfered with while exercising writ jurisdiction of this Court, as this Court while exercising power of judicial Full Judgment