Judgments - Tax/ Tax settlement, Excise Duty
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
TMA INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. & ORS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -6 VERSUS MIELE INDIA PVT. LTD.
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – 04, NEW DELHI VERSUS HCL COMNET SYSTEMS AND SERVICES LTD.
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - CENTRAL -3 VERSUS TANEJA DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTUERE LTD
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
RASHI PERIPHERALS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
BT (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
INGENICO INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT. LTD. VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 10(1) & ORS
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-5 VERSUS M/S. LANDBASE INDIA LTD.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
M/S CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
WESTINGHOUSE SAXBY FARMER LTD. Versus COMMR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE CALCUTTA
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
DELHI CONTRACT BUS ASSOCIATION VERSUS HONBLE LT. GOVERNOR & ORS
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
SHYAM SUNDER SETHI VERSUS PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-10 & ORS
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
The Commissioner, Commercial Tax, U.P., Lucknow Versus S/s Rujhan Studio
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
GOVERNMENT OF KERALA & ANR. VERSUS MOTHER SUPERIOR ADORATION CONVENT
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 VERSUS M/S CINESTAAN ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD.
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
LUPITA SALUJA VERSUS DGGI AND ANR
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DEL SMALL ICE CREAM MANUFACTURERS WELFARE’S ASSOCIATION (REG.) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/s Satyam Cineplexes Ltd. vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - Article 226 of he ConstitutionAvailability of alternative remedy- The writ petition was filed and entertained in the year 2014. It remained pending for more than six years. Despite availability of alternative remedy, it is not proper to relegate the petitioner to avail the said remedy after six years. M.P. Entertainment Duty and Advertisement Tax Act, 1936- Section 2(f)- “Proprietor”- The definition is wide and includes the persons who are Incharge or responsible for the management of Cinema House. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
M/S VELLANKI FRAME WORKS VERSUS THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)