Judgments - Tax/ Tax settlement, Excise Duty
M/S. SPENTEX INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. COMMISSIONER OF C.EXCISE & ORS.
the basic question of law which arises for consideration is as to whether or not the manufacturer/exporter is entitled to rebate of the excise duty paid both on the inputs and on the manufactured product, when excise duty is paid on a manufactured product and also on the inputs which have gone into manufacturing the product and such manufactured product is exported? The aforesaid discussion Full Judgment
C.C.E. MUMBAI - IV Vs. M/S. FITRITE PACKERS, MUMBAI
M/S STAR INDUSTRIES Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORTS) RAIGAD
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AND C.E.NAGPUR Vs. M/S. ISPAT INDUSTRIES LTD.
Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Girish Kumar And 4 Others Vs State Of U.P. And 7 Others
M/S. LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD. ECC CONST.GRP. Vs. C.C.E, HYDERABAD
JAGRITI PLASTICS LTD & Anr. Vs COMMISSIONER OF TRADE & TAXES
THE COMMISSIONER, VAT Vs PURE DRINKS (NEW DELHI) LTD.
LARK LABORATORIES (INDIA) LTD. Vs COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES, DELHI & ANR.
COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE Vs. M/S. G.M. EXPORTS & ORS.
The question of law which arises in the instant appeals is whether anti-dumping duty imposed with respect to imports made during the period between the expiry of the provisional anti-dumping duty and the imposition of the final anti-dumping duty is legal and valid. Full Judgment
SRI.S.N.WADITAR(DEAD) THROUGH LR Vs. COMMNR. OF WEALTH TAX,KARNATAKA
COMMR.OF CUSTOMS,MUMBAI-I Vs. M/S SEIKO BRUSHWARE INDIA
LLOYD ELECTRIC AND ENGINEERING LTD Vs. STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TIRUCHIRAPALLI Vs. M/S. DALMIA CEMENT (BHARAT) LTD.
M/S RAMCHANDRA REXINES (P) LTD AND ORS Vs. COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE BANGALORE-1
M/S. PUROLATOR INDIA LTD. Vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, DELHI-III
A. PRABHAKARA REDDY & CO. Vs. STATE OF M.P. & ORS.
We also find no merit in other submission advanced on behalf of the appellants that there is legal impediment in charging levy on the cost of construction incurred by the employer from a particular period on account of constitution of Board from a particular date or for any other reason. This argument is fallacious. Such beneficial measures for the welfare of workers are applicable even to Full Judgment