Judgments - Sexual Offences
STATE GNCT OF DELHI VERSUS BALJEET SINGH @ SHANKEY
KUMAR GHIMIREY VERSUS THE STATE OF SIKKIM
THE SECRETARY, LUCY SEQUEIRA TRUST AND ANR. VERSUS KAILASH RAMESH TANDEL AND ORS.
Sachin Kumar Singhraha Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Shiva Salame -Versus- State of Madhya Pradesh
NIPUN SAXENA & ANR Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Viran Gyanlal Rajput Versus The State of Maharashtra
MOHAMMED IMRAN VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Joseph Shine VERSUS Union of India
NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA THR. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Vinod alias Rahul Chouhtha - V/s - State of Madhya Pradesh P.S. Kotwali, Shahdol (M.P.)
Law Laid Down: The opinion of an expert is admissible in evidence u/S 293 of the CrPC and therefore, cannot be discarded on the basis of books on Medical Jurisprudence unless the passages which are sought to be discredited in the opinion of the expert are put to him - Judgments relied - AIR 1975 SC 905 (Phool Kumar vs. Delhi Administration) and AIR 1957 SC 589 (Bhagwan Das and another vs. State of Rajasthan). A DNA report must be accepted as scientifically Full Judgment
Mahesh Pahade Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Though it is the responsibility of the State to bring the accused to law but in such process the actual sufferer of crime cannot be permitted to stay outside the law and to watch the proceedings from hindsight. It will be travesty of justice if the victims of such heinous crime are denied right to address their grievances before the courts of law. - Relied upon - Declaration of "Basic Principles of Justice of Victim for Crime and Abuse of Full Judgment