Judgments - Sexual Offences
Gangadhar Narayan Nayak @ Gangadhar Hiregutti Versus State of Karnataka & Ors.
Vidhi ka Ulaghan Karne Wala Balak Versus State of M.P. & Anr.
Geeta Devi Versus State of U.P. & Ors.
HANIF UR RAHMAN Vs. The State of Bihar (through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar)
Union of India and Ors. Versus Mudrika Singh
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA VERSUS SATISH AND ANOTHER
MOHAN KUMAR VERSUS THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
State of M.P. v/s. Irfan & Anr.
Law laid down - Held: Conviction and sentence of appellants under Section 376(DB) of IPC – (i) Prosecutrix, a child of seven years of age was proved to have been subjected to violent gang rape by appellants and prosecutrix was also inflicted life-threatening injuries. (Significant paragraph nos. – 46 to 51) (ii) Conviction under Section 376(DB) of IPC and sentence of hanging by trial Court – Affirmed – Sentencing Policy Discussed – Legislature has imposed death penalty in incidents of child sexual abuse Full Judgment
Ravi @ Toli Vs. State of M.P.
In. Ref. (Suo Moto) Vs. Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath
Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath Vs. The State of MP
Arjun Kumar @ Prince Vs. The State Of Bihar
SUBHASH VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
Sunil Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Raju @ Vijay s/o Daulji Ahirwar V/s State of M.P & one another
Law laid down - The procedure prescribed under section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is to be adopted by the committee or board but where the accused claiming himself to be "Child in conflict with law" is produced before the Magistrate or Sessions Court empowered under Cr.P.C.to conduct trail and an objection is raised about juvenility at the time of commission of offence, the procedure prescribed under section 9 (2) of the JJ Act, Full Judgment