Judgments - Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds
ALL INDIA FOOTBALL FEDERATION VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
ARUN CHHIBBER AND ANR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
CHAMAN GIRI & ORS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
TELANGANA POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD. (TSGENCO) VERSUS ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LTD
RASHI VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
UNION BANK OF INDIA VERSUS MUJAHID QASIM
INDERJIT SINGH SODHI AND OTHERS VERSUS THE CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANOTHER
A.A. Abraham vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - 1. Rule 15 of M.P. Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 - Disciplinary authority can issue direction for conducting ‘further inquiry’. 2. Further inquiry or denovo inquiry- Under Rule 15, the disciplinary authority cannot issue directions to conduct a ‘denovo inquiry’. In the instant case, since charge-sheet remained the same and only direction issued was to record evidence of prosecution witnesses which was not previously recorded, the direction amounts to holding ‘further inquiry’ and not Full Judgment
General Manager, Advani Orlincon Ltd. and Anr Versus Abdul Wahid and Anr
ZAS TELE SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. & ANR VERSUS THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUNDS COMMISSIONER
DR. SONALI BADHE VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ORS
HARJINDER SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
SANJAY KUMAR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Union Bank of India & another vs. Vinod Kumar Dwivedi
Law laid down - Labour/Service Law - The respondent/workman was dismissed from service on the ground that he was party to illegal release of pension of a widow to an incompetent person. The Industrial Tribunal opined that workman was a private driver of a Bank Manager till 2009. Thereafter, he became Peon in the Bank and not responsible for sanction or release of pension. The Clerical Staff and officers who were responsible for sanction and release of pension were inflicted with Full Judgment