Judgments - Service Law / Matter , Provident Funds
Santosh Nag Versus State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors
Soukhiram Patel Versus State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors
LAKSHMI MURDESHWAR PURI VERSUS SAKET GOKHALE
Sanjay Jain Vs. The State of MP & Ors.
Law Point - Service Law-Clause 22 of the Contract - Deeming provision of termination on remaining absent for more than one month-The principles of natural justice must be read into the provision. The Clause-22 is interpreted by taking into account the similar provisions of standing orders etc. Fair Play and Reasonableness -The procedure adopted by employer must be just fair and reasonable. Moreso when its impact is on the right of livelihood of a person. Validity of order-Judicial Review -The validity of an order Full Judgment
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. VERSUS DR. MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA
PUNJAB STATE CO-OP MILK PROD.FED.LTD. VERSUS BALBIR KUMAR WALIA & ORS.
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA HANDLING WORKERS UNION VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Ram Ekbal Mahto Vs. The State of Bihar
Alok Ranjan Vs. The State of Bihar
DR. DIBYENDU MAZUMDAR VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SANJAY PRAKASH & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
SANTOSH KUMAR JHA VERSUS THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER (SOUTH)
Mahip Kumar Rawat Versus Shri Ashwini Kumar Rai & Ors.
Law laid down:- (i) Concept of award of back wages is based on the fundamental principle of compensating the workman for the period he remained unemployed owing to termination which was found to be unlawful at subsequent point of time. Thus, the back wages, if to be worked out based on wages, it would have been drawn by the workman till he actually reinstated; (ii) Any contrary approach to back wages after reinstatement would be opposed to the principle of Public Policy Full Judgment