Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STANDARD CHARTERED BANK VERSUS R.C. SRIVASTAVA

Appeal (Civil), 6092 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS. VERSUS SOMDUTT SHARMA

Appeal (Civil), 6093 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 29, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS DALBIR SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 5848 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 21, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited and another Versus Anil Kanwariya

Appeal (Civil), 5743-5744 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 17, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

MOHD SHAMIM & ORS VERSUS DELHI WAQF BOARD & ANR

W.P.(C), 10429 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 17, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UTTAR PRADESH JAL VIDYUT (S)NIGAM LIMITED & ORS. VERSUS BALBIR SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 5667 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 13, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RANBIR SINGH VERSUS EXECUTIVE ENG.P.W.D.

Appeal (Civil), 4483 of 2010, Judgment Date: Sep 02, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

The State of M.P. & Ors. Versus Yogesh Pathak

WA, 285 of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 31, 2021

Law laid down:- (i) If the purpose of the enquiry is not to find out the truth of the allegations of misconduct but to decide whether to retain the employee against whom a cloud is raised on his conduct such enquiry only serves as a motive for the termination. But where the enquiry is held wherein on the basis of the evidence a definite finding is reached at the back of the employee about his misconduct and such finding forms the Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Suraj Pal Singh Rathor vs. M.P. High Court and another

WRIT PETITION, 4985 of 2019, Judgment Date: Aug 25, 2021

Law laid down - The scope of interference in a writ petition against the order of punishment passed in the departmental inquiry is limited. The Court does not sit in appeal against the order passed in the departmental inquiry. Unless it is shown by the petitioner that the inquiry was not conducted in accordance with the prescribed procedure or there was any violation of the principles of natural justice, no interference in the inquiry proceeding is required. Interference in the departmental Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Amit Chaurasia Vs. The State of M.P. & another

WRIT PETITION, 3658 of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 24, 2021

Law laid down - Applying an exception for not conducting a regular departmental enquiry to dismiss or remove a person or to reduce him in rank. For major penalties there must be some strong and cogent reason with the Authority competent to impose such punishment and should be assigned in writing as to why enquiry is not reasonable and practicable to be held. Imposing major penalties applying the exception of Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India is always a ground of Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Anand Kumar Singh Vs. The State Of Bihar and Ors

Civil Writ, 1498 of 2018, Judgment Date: Aug 17, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Praveen Garg vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and two others

WRIT PETITION, 11687 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 26, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Central Coalfields Limited Through its Chairman and Managing Director & Ors. Versus Smt. Parden Oraon

Appeal (Civil), 897 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Dr. Manish Kumar Pandit Versus State of Chhattisgarh

WPC, 1878 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 07, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAM SINGH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS

W.P.(C), 3567 of 2021, Judgment Date: Mar 23, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MANMOD SHANKAR VERSUS LIC OF INDIA & ANR

LPA, 93 of 2021, Judgment Date: Mar 04, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HC RAM NARESH VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS

W.P.(C), 2779 of 2021, Judgment Date: Mar 02, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BHOPAL SINGH VERSUS DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS

W.P.(C), 8159 of 2019, Judgment Date: Mar 01, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Ram Karan Dwivedi Vs. State of M.P. and others

WRIT PETITION, 9186 of 2006, Judgment Date: Feb 11, 2021

Law Laid Down :- Constitutional Court while exercising its jurisdiction of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution would not normally interfere where the enquiry was held by competent authority and where the rules of natural justice were followed or where the finding arrived at by the authority are based on evidence. The Court although cannot sit in appeal over the findings recorded by the Disciplinary Authority or the Enquiry Officer in a departmental enquiry, it does not mean that Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Jagdish Singh Jatav vs. State of MP and Others

WRIT PETITION, 8154 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jan 21, 2021

Full Judgment