Judgments - Removal from Service
Ravindra Nath Tripathi Versus The Union Of India & Ors.
Kirti Kumar Dwivedi Versus Registrar General High Court Of M.P.&Anr.
Umesh Kumar Pahwa Versus The Board of Directors Uttarakhand Gramin Bank & Ors.
UNITED BANK OF INDIA VERSUS BISWANATH BHATTACHARJEE
DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION Versus Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele
Brijesh Chandra Dwivedi (Dead) Thr. LRs. Versus Sanya Sahayak and Ors.
INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ORS. Versus OM PRAKASH LAL SRIVASTAVA
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Versus Dilip Uttam Jayabhay
Nilima Kumari Vs. The State Of Bihar
Union of India & Ors. vs. Ram Bahadur Yadav
Chandresh Shukla Vs. The Registrar, People’s University
Law laid down - The order should clearly reflect the reasons thereof, subsequent explanation or reasons justifying the impugned order not permissible. (See para-10) Recording of reasons for terminating the services in the impugned order is necessary, as the reasons are the heartbeat of any order. Non-speaking orders do not stand judicial scrutiny. (See para-9) Full Judgment
Rajesh Kumar Rathore vs. High Court of M.P. and another
Law laid down - Held:- when the services of a temporary employee or a probationer or contingency paid employee is brought to an end by passing innocuous order due to unsatisfactory nature of service or on account of an act for which some action is taken, but the termination is made in a simplicitor manner without conducting of inquiry or without casting any stigma on the employee, the provisions of Rule 9 of the Rules 1980 can be taken aid of. However, Full Judgment