Judgments - Regularisation
VIBHUTI SHANKAR PANDEY VERSUS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Devendra Kumar Soni Versus State of M.P & others
CHEBROLU LEELA PRASAD RAO & ORS VERSUS STATE OF A.P. & ORS.
AMRISH KUMAR & ORS VERSUS INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MASS COMMUNICATION
OM PAL SINGH VERSUS L.I.C. OF INDIA & ORS
Dr. Saiyad Ghazanafar Ishtiaque Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - 1. Once the petitioner appointed on the post of Unani Chikitsa Adhikari under Rule 6 of Madhya Pradesh Health Services (Recruitment) Rules 1967, which gives power to the State Government to appoint a person without consultation with Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission and said power is duly endorsed by Rule 3 of Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1957 then the said appointment of petitioner would be treated as regular appointment. 2. Once the petitioner Full Judgment
State of M.P. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Jain
Law Laid Down - “Whether a daily-wager who is declared permanent by way of classification, by the employer, merely on completion of 240 days of service as daily-wager, without any judicial intervention is entitled to claim salary alongwith increments in the regular pay-scale admissible to a civil post or is merely entitled to salary equivalent to the minimum of the regular pay-scale without increments and in this backdrop whether the impugned orders granting benefit of regular pay-scale with increments are liable to be Full Judgment
Caparo Engineering India Ltd Vs. Pradhanmantri Engineering Shramik Sanghthan
DILIP KR. BASUMATARY & 27 ORS. VS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.
JALAL UDDIN BARBHUIYA VS THE STATE OF ASSAM & 2 ORS
PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. (R) VS SMTI SUNITA BORAH & 2 ORS.
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (NIELIT) & 3 ORS. VS SAZZAD ZAHIR
LIFE INSURANCE CORPN. OF INDIA VS GUNAJIT DAS
LIFE INSURANCE CORPN. OF INDIA VS GUNAJIT DAS
Anil Belsare & Another Vs. State of MP & Another
STATE OF U.P. Vs. PURAN SINGH & ORS.
RAM NARESH RAWAT Vs. SRI ASHWINI RAY AND ORS.
From the aforesaid, it follows that though a 'permanent employee' has right to receive pay in the graded pay-scale, at the same time, he would be getting only minimum of the said pay-scale with no increments. It is only the regularisation in service which would entail grant of increments etc. in the pay-scale. In view of the aforesaid, we do not find any substance in the contentions raised by Full Judgment
JIVANLAL Vs. PRAVIN KRISHNA, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ORS.
Ajay Kumar Misra and Ors. Vs Hon'ble High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad Thru. R.G.& Ors
DULU DEVI Vs. STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS
mere passing of an order of dismissal or termination would not be effective unless it is published and communicated to the officer concerned. If the appointing authority passes an order of dismissal, but does not communicate it to the officer concerned, theoretically it is possible that unlike in the case on a judicial order pronounced in Court, the authority may change its mind and decide to modify its order. The order Full Judgment