Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

K.P. Khemka Versus Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited

Appeal (Civil), 6144 of 2024, Judgment Date: May 08, 2024

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SHRIPATI LAKHU MANE VERSUS THE MEMBER SECRETARY MAHARASHTRA WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD

Appeal (Civil), 556 of 2012, Judgment Date: Mar 30, 2022

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA VERSUS SUSHIL CHANDER SHARMA & ORS

C.R.P., 272 of 2019, Judgment Date: Nov 08, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

M/S. AUTO MOVERS VERSUS LUMINOUS POWER TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD.

CM(M), 604 of 2020, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SANSAR CHAND SHARMA VERSUS KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD THROUGH CHIEF MANAGER SH G S PANDEY

CM(M), 986 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Recovery
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SPACEBIZ SOLUTION PVT LTD. VERSUS AJAY SHARMA

CM(M), 570 of 2020, Judgment Date: Nov 12, 2020

Full Judgment

Tags Recovery
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

VISHNU INFRA AND ENERGY SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. & ANR VERSUS ROHIT SINGHAL & ORS

C.R.P., 72 of 2020, Judgment Date: Nov 10, 2020

Full Judgment

Tags Recovery
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

M/S. L&T HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED VERSUS M/S. TRISHUL DEVELOPERS AND ANR.

Appeal (Civil), 3413 of 2020, Judgment Date: Oct 27, 2020

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

M/s.Anik Industries Ltd Vs. M/s.DCM Shriram Consolidated Ltd

FA, 514 of 2018, Judgment Date: Nov 22, 2018

Law laid down - [a] If the arbitration clause is contained in the annexure to the contract document and the annexure is specifically mentioned therein, then the arbitration agreement exists between the parties. [b] Sec.8 of the Act mandates a judicial authority to refer the parties to arbitration in case whether pending action is subject matter of an arbitration agreement and in such cases the judicial authority does not commit any error in disposing of the civil action while referring the Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

The General Manager and another Vs. M/s Raisingh and Company

AR, 7 of 2016, Judgment Date: Mar 13, 2018

Law Laid Down -  The extension in time does not extend the period of completion of the agreement. It only permits the Contractor to complete works subject to payment of liquidated damages, as agreed to. Liquidated damages are claimed on account of breach of the contract and such amount cannot be said to be unreasonable or is by way of penalty. In absence of any allegation that the Award passed by the Arbitrator is against the public policy, liquidated damages imposed in Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sawailal Jalon Vs. State of MP & Another.

WRIT PETITION, 3179 of 2009, Judgment Date: Feb 20, 2018

Law laid down - Merely continuation of a departmental enquiry instituted against delinquent Government employee, who was in service, will not automatically terminate on completion of two years' period from the date of superannuation. In fact, if the departmental enquiry is not completed within two years of date of superannuation, then such an employee will become entitled for release of cent percent pensionery dues, but they will be subject to final outcome of the departmental enquiry and the intent of the Full Judgment

Tags Recovery
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Manish Makhija Vs. Central Bank of India and others

WRIT PETITION, 14166 of 2017, Judgment Date: Feb 15, 2018

Law laid down - Section 14(1) of the Securitisation & Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002- satisfaction of Magistrate- not specifically required to be recorded. The satisfaction is regarding adjudicating that nine points of declaration are covered in the affidavit. It does not call for any modicum of enquiry into the veracity or justification or the decision of declaration or any aspect thereof. Even if the word “satisfaction” is not recorded by the Magistrate but his Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Raghav Singh Chouhan Vs. State of M.P. & Ors

WRIT PETITION, 8084 of 2016, Judgment Date: Dec 05, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Recovery
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Rajput Road Lines & another Vs. Devendra Kumar Pranami

WRIT PETITION, 4896 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 01, 2017

Full Judgment