Filter by Date
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

TALLURI SRIKAR (MINOR) THROUGH HIS FATHER TALLURI SRIKRISHNA VERSUS THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY

Special Leave Petition (Civil), 20243 of 2024, Judgment Date: Sep 13, 2024

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SAYUNKTA SANGARSH SAMITI Versus THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Appeal (Civil), 1359 of 2023, Judgment Date: Dec 15, 2023

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Afjal Ansari versus State of UP

Appeal (Crl.), 3838 of 2023, Judgment Date: Dec 14, 2023

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Deepika Singh Versus Central Administrative Tribunal and Others

Appeal (Civil), 5308 of 2022, Judgment Date: Aug 16, 2022

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Smt. Urmila Singh Versus Saudan Singh

WRIT PETITION, 4131 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 26, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

AMAR VIVEK AGGARWAL & ORS. VERSUS HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA & ORS.

Writ Petition (Civil), 687 of 2021, Judgment Date: May 04, 2022

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Rushikesh Bharat Garud Versus The State of Maharashtra and others

Appeal (Civil), 7442 of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 10, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Estate Officer Versus Colonel H.V. Mankotia (Retired)

Appeal (Civil), 6223 of 2021, Judgment Date: Oct 07, 2021

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Awadh Kishor Roy Vs. The State of Bihar

Civil Writ, 9878 of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 24, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF ORISSA Versus DASARATHI MEHER

Appeal (Civil), 7362 of 2013, Judgment Date: Sep 27, 2018

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Vs. DILEEP KUMAR SINGH

Appeal (Civil), 2466 of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 26, 2015

These appeals raise an interesting question as to  the  interpretation of a proviso contained in  Section  47  of  the  Persons  with  Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of  Rights  and  Full  Participation)  Act, 1995 (in short the "1995 Act"). It is well settled that the provisions  of  a  statute  must  be  read harmoniously together.  However, if this is not possible then it is  settled law that where there is a conflict between  two  Sections,  and  you  cannot reconcile the two, you have to determine which is the leading provision  Full Judgment