Filter by Date
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Ravi @ Toli Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 3007 of 2020, Judgment Date: Sep 09, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

In. Ref. (Suo Moto) Vs. Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath

CRRFC, 5 of 2020, Judgment Date: Sep 08, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath Vs. The State of MP

Criminal Appeal, 4965 of 2020, Judgment Date: Sep 08, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

SHABIR DANDOO VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER

BAIL APPLN., 3872 of 2020, Judgment Date: Aug 18, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

RANJEET NAIK VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

CRL.A., 615 of 2020, Judgment Date: Aug 12, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Munnalal and Jagdish Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 32, 119 of 2011, Judgment Date: Aug 04, 2021

Law laid down - (1) Prosecutrix in a rape case – conviction can be based only on the basis of solitary evidence of prosecutrix but such witness should be of “sterling quality”. Citation relied upon - Krishna Kumar Malik Vs. State of Haryana [(2011) 7 SCC 130] & Rai Sandeep @ Deepu Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) reported in (2012) 8 SCC 21]. (2) While deciding rape case, the Court must also evaluate the impact of such insinuation on a person Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Abhishek Chouhan s/o Kailash Chouhan vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 29708 of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 03, 2021

Law laid down - 1. It is held that, in majority of the cases of rape, the defence of the accused is that the prosecutrix was a consenting party and in most of the cases the accused gets the benefit of doubt also, but in the considered opinion of this Court, barring some exceptions, India are a conservative society, it has not yet reached such level (advance or lower) of civilization where unmarried girls, regardless of their religion, indulge in carnal Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

In Reference (Suo Moto) Vs. Manoj

CRRFC, 8 of 2019, Judgment Date: Jul 28, 2021

Full Judgment

Patna High Court (Single Judge)

Arjun Kumar @ Prince Vs. The State Of Bihar

Criminal Appeal, 159 of 2018, Judgment Date: Jul 07, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

PHAGUNI MAHTO @ PANKAJ KUMAR VERSUS STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI)

CRL.A., 625 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Karan Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Criminal Appeal, 262 of 2002, Judgment Date: Jun 30, 2021

Law laid down - 1 (i) Whether the sentence of life imprisonment awarded to the appellant means actual sentence of 14 years or 20 years ? Ans: Section 53 of the IPC provides for sentence of imprisonment of life and the definition of life as contained in Section 45 makes it clear that life means the life of human being till he breath his last. A sentence for imprisonment of life will run for the entire life of the convict unless the Full Judgment

Tags Rape Sentence
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Sunil Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh

Criminal Revision, 853 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2021

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

ABC Versus State Of Chhattisgarh

WPC, 2294 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Prosecutrix (Minor) through her Natural Guardian Vs. State of M.P. and others

WRIT PETITION, 5321 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 23, 2021

Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Raju @ Vijay s/o Daulji Ahirwar V/s State of M.P & one another

Criminal Appeal, 5475 of 2020, Judgment Date: Jun 10, 2021

Law laid down -  The procedure prescribed under section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 is to be adopted by the committee or board but where the accused claiming himself to be "Child in conflict with law" is produced before the Magistrate or Sessions Court empowered under Cr.P.C.to conduct trail and an objection is raised about juvenility at the time of commission of offence, the procedure prescribed under section 9 (2) of the JJ Act, Full Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)

Vishal Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh

MCRC, 17991 of 2021, Judgment Date: May 04, 2021

Law laid down -  Exception 2 of Section 375 of IPC is irrational. Marriageable age in India is 18 years, giving consent for sexual intercourse is also 18 years. Exception is inconsistent with the provisions of POCSO Act. Definition of “Child” as per Section 2(1)(d) is below 18 years. The preamble also provides that “sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children are heinous crimes and need to be effectively addressed” This is directly in conflict with Exception 2 of Section 375 of IPC. Section Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

MR. VIVEK KUMAR YADAV VERSUS STATE & ANR

CRL.M.C., 1034 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Patan Jamal Vali Versus The State of Andhra Pradesh

Appeal (Crl.), 452 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 27, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Rape
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

AMEET KHANDELWAL VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

BAIL APPLN., 1162 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 23, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Pramod Yadav Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh and others

Criminal Appeal, 5189 of 2020, Judgment Date: Apr 22, 2021

Full Judgment

Tags Bail Rape