Judgments - Quashing of Complaint/ Orders
MAN Trucks India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. & others
Law laid down - Month as defined in Rule 2(e) of the Madhya Pradesh Motoryan Karadhan Rules, 1991 in a case where period of a month commences from a day subsequent to the first day of the month, means the period commencing from that date till the corresponding date in the succeeding month. It does not mean 30 days’ period or the period for the remaining days of the month. Full Judgment
Dr. Jagdish Prasad & Ors. VERSUS State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Lalji S/o Bihari Lal Vs. State of M.P. and others
Law laid down - During execution proceedings for recovery of compensation awarded under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, award holder died........, the legal representatives of the deceased-award holder are therefore, required to produce succession certificate to enable them to prosecute the execution proceedings. Full Judgment
Smt. Pooja Parihar Vs. State of M.P. and others
RAJENDRA SINGH AND ANR. Vs. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANR.
Law Laid down - 1. Sec. 53-A and Sec. 164-A inserted in the Cr.P.C by way of Amendment Act 2005 which makes the DNA profiling of accused and victim must, is a step towards more Forensic and Scientific Investigation. Therefore, if the DNA report is supported by medical evidence, wherein injuries to the prosecutrix are not sustained over the private parts or over her person and attending circumstances, do not corroborate in any manner, then false implication of the accused can Full Judgment
Anek Singh Tomar vs. Dhaniram S/o Shri Bhagchand (dead) through LRs.
Sateele @ Ramnivas vs. State of MP
Dr. Sandeep Vs. State of M.P.
Nayan Prasad & Ors. Versus State of Bihar & Anr.
Dr. Shraddha Saxena Versus State of M.P. & others
M/S. COTT BEVERAGES INC. (ROYAL CROWN COLA INTERNATIONAL DIVISION) USA AND THREE OTHERS Vs. M/S. TRISTAR BEVERAGES PVT. LTD., INDORE
Law laid down - The criminal proceedings manifestly attended with malafide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and turning a civil litigation into a criminal litigation, deserves to be quashed. Full Judgment
Gyanchand Jain Vs. State of Madhya Prdesh
Girraj Sharma Vs. State of MP
A.K. Hade Vs. Shailendra Singh Yadav and another
Yusuf Khan Vs. Sheikh Gulam Mohammad @ Shahanshah
Smt. Kamla Yadav and Others vs. State of MP and Another
Rakesh Kumar and Others vs. State of MP and Anr.
Monu @ Saurabh Kumar Chaturvedi Vs. State of M.P. & Anr.
Law Laid Down - The offence under the unamended provision of Sec. 3(1)(x) of the 1989 Act – The victim is Project Officer – The insult and intimidation was directed against the Project Officer arising out of victim's resistence in allowing joining of sister-in- law of the accused- Insult and intimidation was directed against the Project Officer and not against the SC / ST status / capacity of the Project Officer- Thus offence u/s 3(1) (x) not made out even on Full Judgment