Filter by Date
Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS Vs. V.K. KADYAN

W.P.(C), 2090 of 2016, Judgment Date: Jul 10, 2017

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court

Anil Kumar Khare Vs. State Of U.P Thru Secy Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad Lko & Ors

SPECIAL APPEAL, 277 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 05, 2017

Full Judgment

Tags Promotion
Gauhati High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

MRS. A. CHUNE & 15 ORS VS THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS

WP(C), 34 of 2011, Judgment Date: May 02, 2017

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

B.K.PAVITRA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 2368 of 2011, Judgment Date: Feb 09, 2017

It is clear from the above discussion that exercise for determining ‘inadequacy of representation’, ‘backwardness’ and ‘overall efficiency’, is a must for exercise of power under Article 16(4A). Mere fact that there is no proportionate representation in promotional posts for the population of SCs and STs is not by itself enough to grant consequential seniority to promotees who are otherwise junior and thereby denying seniority to those who are given Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

P. SIVANANDI Vs. RAJEEV KUMAR & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 4822-4826 of 2007, Judgment Date: Feb 02, 2017

These appeals raise a narrow question for consideration, namely, whether the Annual Confidential Report (ACR) of an officer forms a part of his ‘service record’ and whether it could be ignored for the purposes of his promotion merely on the ground that it was written after some delay. In our opinion, the ACR of an officer forms a part of his service record and he cannot be Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Vs. NIKHIL RANJAN CHAKRABORTY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 691-693 of 2017, Judgment Date: Jan 20, 2017

The law is thus clear that a candidate has the right to be considered in the light of the existing rules, namely, “rules in force on the date” the consideration takes place and that there is no rule of absolute application that vacancies must invariably be filled by the law existing on the date when they arose. As against the case of total exclusion and Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SANJAY KUMAR UPADHYAY Vs. PALAK DHARI YADAV & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8068 of 2009, Judgment Date: Feb 03, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA SC/ST EMPLOYEES WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ORS.

Review Petition (Civil), 891 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 08, 2016

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PRAMOD Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Appeal (Civil), 14735 of 2015, Judgment Date: Dec 29, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

C. CHAKKARAVARTHY & ORS. Vs. TMT. M. SATYAVATHY, I.A.S., & ORS.

Contempt Petition (Civil), 339 of 2013, Judgment Date: Oct 16, 2015

The question that fell for consideration therein was whether the practice adopted by the Government of Pondicherry of counting the service of Section Officers/Junior Engineers who have qualified as graduates while in service only from the date they passed the degree or equivalent examination for purposes of promotion to the post of Assistant Engineers under Rule 11(1) of the Government of Pondicherry Assistant Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)

Parmesh Kumar & Another Vs State Of U.P. & 5 Others

WRIT - A, 58871 of 2015, Judgment Date: Oct 14, 2015

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

BALWANT KAUR Vs DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & ORS

LPA, 99 of 2015, Judgment Date: Sep 10, 2015

Full Judgment

Tags Promotion
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAVINDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. STATE OF M.P & ORS

Appeal (Civil), 5853-5854 of 2008, Judgment Date: Sep 04, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

U.V.MAHADKAR Vs. SUBHASH ANAND CHAVAN & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 843 of 2012, Judgment Date: Sep 02, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

S.PANNEER SELVAM & ORS. Vs. GOVT.OF T.NADU & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6631-6632 of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 27, 2015

The concept of ‘catch-up rule’ and ‘consequential seniority’ is judicially evolved concepts to control the extent of reservation. The question of reservation and the associated promotion and the consequential seniority have been the matter of discussion in various decisions of this Court. The matter regarding reservation in promotions was considered by a nine Judge Bench of this Court in Indra Sawhney And Ors. vs. Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

SAROJ KUMAR Vs. U.O.I & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6081 of 2015, Judgment Date: Aug 18, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RAMESH KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 811 of 2007, Judgment Date: Jul 31, 2015

In normal circumstances when retrospective promotions are effected, all benefits flowing therefrom, including monetary benefits, must be extended to an employee who has been denied promotion earlier. The principle of “no work no pay” would not be attracted where the respondents were in fault in not considering the case of the appellant for promotion and not allowing Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

PRABHU DAYAL KHANDELWAL Vs. CHAIRMAN, U.P.S.C. & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 8006-8007 of 2003, Judgment Date: Jul 23, 2015

Full Judgment

Allahabad High Court (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)

Raeesul Hasan Vs. State Of U.P.Through Secy.Education And 5 Ors.

WRIT - A, 1593 of 2001, Judgment Date: May 14, 2015

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

HC PRADEEP KUMAR RAI & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 6549 of 2014, Judgment Date: May 11, 2015

Full Judgment