Judgments - PIL
TALAULICAR & SONS P.LTD. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. - PIL
JEEJA GHOSH & ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Dr.Tapan Bhattacharya versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
SAVELIFE FOUNDATION & ANR Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
We also direct that the scheme framed by the Central Government and this order be widely published through electronic media and print media for the benefit of public so that public is made aware and that serves as impetus to good Samaritans to extend timely help and protection conferred upon them without incurring the risk of harassment. Full Judgment
RAJENDRA K. GUPTA Versus SHRI SHIVRAJSINGH COUHAN, CHIEF MINISTER OF M.P. & ORS
PURUSHOTHAM Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
Udaypal Singh Vs State Of U.P. & 21 Others
SHREYA SINGHAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises very important and far-reaching questions relatable primarily to the fundamental right of free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. 119. Full Judgment
ANIRUDH KUMAR Vs. MUNICIPAL CORP. OF DELHI & ORS.
Be as that may, this nature of ligation cannot be allowed to be settled between the parties as it involves public interest and violation of rule of law. The running of the Pathological Lab in the building by the respondent-owners amount to violation of the rule of law and affects the public interest, therefore, it is public interest litigation even though the appellant herein Full Judgment
SAI KRIPA MANGAL KARYALAYA & ORS. VERSUS NAGPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.
In absence of the sanctioned plan, we are of the view that the High Court was not justified in deciding the disputed question of fact as to whether the building was constructed in accordance with Town Planning Scheme. the High Court was not justified in entertaining the so called Public Interest Litigation filed by persons who had personal dispute with respondent no.4. we Full Judgment
SUBHAS DATTA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
This petition has been filed as public interest litigation on the issue of protection of historical objects preserved at different places in the country particularly in various museums. Prayer in the petition is for a direction for adequate security arrangements and for proper investigation into the incidents of theft and damage to several historical objects and also for making an inventory of available articles for future. It can hardly be gainsaid Full Judgment