Judgments - PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
S.P. VELUMANI VERSUS ARAPPOR IYAKKAM AND ORS.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
J.Sekar @Sekar Reddy Versus Directorate of Enforcement
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
EASTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED & ORS. VERSUS RABINDRA KUMAR BHARTI
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. VERSUS MAJOR R. METRI NO. 08585N
Tags PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
KALYAN DOMBIVALI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VERSUS SANJAY GAJANAN GHARAT AND ANOTHER
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
The State of Karnataka & Anr Versus Umesh
Tags PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
THE SECRETARY, LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT AND ORS. ETC. Versus K. CHANDRAN ETC.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
ABHAY JAIN VERSUS THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AND ANR.
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Deepali Jadhav Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
Tags PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
K. SHANTHAMMA v. THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
DEVAS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LTD. Versus ANTRIX CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
N. Raghavender VERSUS State of Andhra Pradesh, CBI
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
STATE OF ODISHA Versus PRATIMA MOHANTY ETC.
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
THE STATE BY S.P. THROUGH THE SPE CBI VERSUS UTTAMCHAND BOHRA
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
M.L. Mittal Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & another
Law laid down - Mere pendency of an appeal against the acquittal order of an employee does not confer any right upon the respondent/employer to withhold the retiral dues of the employee. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
The State of Jammu & Kashmir and others Versus Dr. Saleem Ur Rehman
Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Birendra Kumar Vs. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Arun Kumar Dey v/s The State of Madhya Pradesh through Special Police Establishment
Law laid down - 1. Section 311 of the Cr.P.C – The Section is in two parts. In the first part, the word “may” is employed whereas second part uses “shall”. Thus, first part gives pure discretion to the criminal court whereas second part makes it mandatory to summon the witness. Second part of Section 311 of the Cr.P.C - The litmus test to exercise power under the second part aforesaid is whether it is essential to the just decision of a Full Judgment
Tags PC Act
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Anr. Versus Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi @ T. H. Vijayalakshmi and Anr.
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)