Judgments - NDPS
Sanjay Kamkar @ Sanjay Kumar Versus The State of Bihar
HERRY @ IKWUNNAYA KIZITO IFEANYI VERSUS STATE
Sk. Sakkar @ Mannan VERSUS State of West Bengal
MOHD. SHAHID @ MOHD. SAHID VERSUS THE STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI
Raja Bhaiya Singh Vs State of MP
Law laid down - 1. The order dated 23.3.2020 of Supreme Court related to extension of time limit, was not applicable for filing the challan within 60 days or 90 days as prescribed under CrPC. 2. Order upon the application filed for default bail under section 167(2) of CrPC is not an interlocutory order because it decided the valuable right of default bail finally at that stage. Therefore, revision is tenable against the aforesaid order. 3. (i) Period for filing the challan will Full Judgment
Dheerendra Dwivedi @ Dheeru Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Order granting interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 or under Section 457(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure is interlocutory order and criminal revision is not maintainable against it. Full Judgment
Aruni Sahgal Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Order granting interim custody of vehicle under Section 451 or under Section 457(1) of Code of Criminal Procedure is interlocutory order and criminal revision is not maintainable against it. Full Judgment
GOVARDHAN VIGRAHAM VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
ROHIT VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS
Raju @ Surendar Nath Sonkar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - 1. Indian Evidence Act,1872 - Independent prosecution witnesses/witnesses about the search memo turned hostile. The police officer (PW/4) alone supported the Panchnama. His statement could not be demolished during cross examination. The conviction can be recorded solely on the basis of a credible statement of police officer. The evidence of official witness cannot be distrusted and disbelieved merely on account of his official status. 2. Interpretation of statute - (i) A statute must be read as a whole Full Judgment