Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1457
of 2021, Judgment Date: Dec 07, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 673
of 1998, Judgment Date: Dec 07, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 3149
of 2020, Judgment Date: Nov 09, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 2302
of 2021, Judgment Date: Oct 21, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MISC. CRL, 43856
of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 23, 2021
Law laid down -
Applicability of bar as provided under Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in case of application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Admittedly, the provisions of the Act have harsher provisions for sentencing and even harsher when it comes to bail, as has been provided under Section 37 of the Act. In the case of Murleedharan v. State of Kerala, while dealing with a similar provision, Section 41-A of Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1043
of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 22, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 749
of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 20, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
CRL.A., 559
of 2020, Judgment Date: Sep 16, 2021
Full Judgment
Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 32
of 2016, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2021
Full Judgment
Patna High Court (Single Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 106
of 2016, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2021
Full Judgment
Patna High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Criminal Appeal, 1102
of 2017, Judgment Date: Sep 15, 2021
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC->MISC. CRIMINAL CASE, 3804
of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 10, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1281
of 2021, Judgment Date: Sep 08, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1030
of 2021, Judgment Date: Aug 24, 2021
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
MISC. CRL, 31747
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 28, 2021
Law laid down:-
1. Sections 35, 54 and 66 under NDPS Act raise presumptions (which are rebuttable) over accused to prove his innocence, although the standard of proof required for the accused to prove his innocence is Preponderance of Probability which accused shall have to establish. NDPS Act carries reverse burden of proof under Sections 35 and 54. Noor Aga Vs. State of Punjab, (2008) 16 SCC 417 relied.
2. An initial burden exists upon the prosecution and when it stands satisfied, Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 851
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1416
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jul 06, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1207
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1136
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 25, 2021
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL APPLN., 1177
of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 03, 2021
Full Judgment
