Judgments - Murder
PANKAJ Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
KADMANIAN @ MANIKANDAN Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE
ASHIQ HUSSAIN FAKTOO Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The principle of ex debito justitiae is founded on a recognition of a debt that the justice delivery system owes to a litigant to correct an error in a judicial dispensation. Its application, by the very nature of things, cannot be made to depend on varying perceptions of legal omissions and commissions but such recognition of the debt which have the potential of opening new vistas of Full Judgment
State of Chhattisgarh Vs . Sunil @ Balikaran Sahu & Anr.
BRIJ LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Every accused is presumed to be innocent unless his guilt is proved. The presumption of innocence is a human right. Subject to the statutory exceptions, the said principle forms the basis of criminal jurisprudence in India. The nature of the offence, its seriousness and gravity has to be taken into consideration. The appellate court should bear in mind the presumption of innocence Full Judgment
KALA @ CHANDRAKALA Vs. STATE TR.INSP.OF POLICE
The prosecution has not been able to complete the chain of circumstances so as to fasten the guilt and to prove the commission of offence by the appellant beyond periphery of doubt. The appellant is acquitted giving her the benefit of doubt. Full Judgment
BABY @ SEBASTIAN & ANR. Vs. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ADIMALY - IPC-Section 302
DEVRAJ Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - IPC - Section 302, 201
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS. Vs. STATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE
“Whether consecutive life sentences can be awarded to a convict on being found guilty of a series of murders for which he has been tried in a single trial?.” 17. The legal position is, thus, fairly well settled that imprisonment for life is a sentence for the remainder of the life of the offender unless of course the remaining sentence is commuted or remitted by the competent authority. That being Full Judgment
MEERA MYDEEN ETC.ETC. Vs. STATE OF T.NADU
Dr. P.S. Thakur versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Murder
Dr. P.S. Thakur versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Murder Full Judgment
STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. JAYRAJBHAI PUNJABHAI VARU - Murder
10) The courts below have to be extremely careful when they deal with a dying declaration as the maker thereof is not available for the cross- examination which poses a great difficulty to the accused person. A mechanical approach in relying upon a dying declaration just because it is there is extremely dangerous. The court has to examine a dying Full Judgment
MUMTAZ @ MUNTYAZ Vs. STATE OF U.P.(NOW UTTARKHAND) - Murder
PRAFUL SUDHAKAR PRAB Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Murder
RAJU DEVADE Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA - Murder
JAMNADAS Vs. STATE OF M.P - Murder, Dowry Death, Cruelty.
NARENDER KUMAR AHLAWAT V/s STATE (NCT OF DELHI) - on bail,murder
PRAGNA PARAMITA PRAHARAJ Vs. STATE OF ORISSA
STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. FIROZ KHAN @ ARIF KHAN
Held We are constrained to observe that the High Court grossly erred in passing the impugned order without assigning any reason. In our considered opinion, it was a clear case of total non application of mind to the case by the learned Judges because the order impugned neither sets out the facts nor the submissions of the parties nor the findings and nor the reasons as to why the leave to file appeal is declined to the appellant. We, therefore, disapprove Full Judgment