Judgments - Murder
Asar Mohammad and Ors. :Versus: The State of U.P
RAJENDRA SINGH VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Bilal Hajar @ Abdul Hameed VERSUS State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
BASAVARAJ alias BASAVANNAPPA PARMESHWAR BANGARGIR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VERSUS CHHAAKKI LAL AND ANOTHER
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VERSUS CHHAAKKI LAL AND ANOTHER
MOHD. ALAM Vs. STATE
SMT. SHAMIM VERSUS STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)
Referred Cases 1, CHANDRAPPA & ORS Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA 2, State of U.P. Versus Krishna Master & Ors. Full Judgment
Madhav vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - Deposition of Investigating Officer-A public servant must be presumed to act honestly and conscientiously and their evidence has to be assessed on its intrinsic worth and cannot be discarded. Plea of Private Defence- Even if an accused does not plead self defence, it is open to the court to consider such a plea if the same arises from the material on record. Common intention under Section 34 of IPC- "Common Intention" implies a pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to the Full Judgment
Premnarayan Yadav Vs. State of MP & another
YASHWANT ETC. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Menoka Malik and others Versus The State of West Bengal and others
DHARMENDER Vs. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
State of Haryana Versus Rajesh Aggarwal & Anr.
Imtiyaz Ramzan Khan Versus State of Maharashtra
Vinod alias Rahul Chouhtha - V/s - State of Madhya Pradesh P.S. Kotwali, Shahdol (M.P.)
Law Laid Down: The opinion of an expert is admissible in evidence u/S 293 of the CrPC and therefore, cannot be discarded on the basis of books on Medical Jurisprudence unless the passages which are sought to be discredited in the opinion of the expert are put to him - Judgments relied - AIR 1975 SC 905 (Phool Kumar vs. Delhi Administration) and AIR 1957 SC 589 (Bhagwan Das and another vs. State of Rajasthan). A DNA report must be accepted as scientifically Full Judgment