Judgments - Murder
IRFAN @ CHHENU VERSUS STATE, NCT OF DELHI
IRFAN @ CHHENU VERSUS STATE, NCT OF DELHI
Pahalwan Singh @ Chimme Versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Harjit Singh Versus Inderpreet Singh @ Inder and another
MANJEET SINGH Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
Saranya Versus Bharathi and another
LALA @ ANURAG PRAKASH AASRE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
AMIT SHARMA VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
NADIR@SHAH ALAM VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
MADHAV Versus STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Devkaran Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - (A) Conviction only on the basis of dying declaration recorded under Section 32 of Evidence Act – Before convicting only on the basis of dying declaration, the Court must act with prudence and due caution and care and in case doubt arises, then it is an obligation to closely scrutinise all the relevant attendant circumstances. Judgments relied upon :– (1) Khushal Rao Vs. State of Bombay [AIR 1958 SC 22]. (2) Panchdeo Singh Vs. State of Bihar [AIR 2002 Full Judgment
Hafiz Mian @ Hafiz Miya and Ors Vs. The State Of Bihar
Naresh vs. State of MP
Durgesh Singh Bhadauria vs. State of MP
Parubai Versus The State of Maharashtra
Surajdeo Mahto and Anr. VERSUS The State of Bihar
Raghuram @ Raghoram vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (1) Dying Declaration recorded by Doctor – The wife of appellant was burnt 100% and she was conscious and oriented but her condition was grim. It was natural for Doctor to undertake the task of recording dying declaration himself in view of precarious condition..... Para 26 Citation relied upon – Abdul Majid Abdul Rehman, AIR 1976 SC 1782. (2) Appellant's subsequent conduct relevant under Section 8 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Para 30. Full Judgment