Judgments - Money Laundering
AMARENDRA DHARI SINGH VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
BIMAL KUMAR JAIN and NARESH JAIN VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
Hdfc Bank Limited Muzaffarpur Vs. Government Of India Ministry Of Finance
Abhay Nigam & Others Vs. Union of India & Others
Law laid down - The Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 - Section 5 – Attachment of Property – The attachment order passed by Competent Authority in exercise of power under Section 5 is tentative/provisional in nature. Thus, the “reason to believe” in passing such order is also provisional in nature subject to its confirmation by the “adjudicating authority”. Section 8 of The Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 – The adjudicating authority is under a statutory obligation to examine the complaint Full Judgment
M/S WAVE HOSPITALITY PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
SAI CHANDRASEKHAR VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
UNION BANK OF INDIA E ANDHRA BANK VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
OPTO Circuit India Ltd. Versus Axis Bank & Ors.
HAMILTON HOUSEWARE PVT. LTD. VERSUS HAMILTON HOUSEWARE PVT. LTD.
PAYPAL PAYMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT INDIA
BLISS ABODE PVT. LTD. VERSUS ZONAL OFFICE DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ORS
Vidyut Kumar Sarkar @ Ashok Das Versus The State of Bihar
AVINASH MEHROTRA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS
FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT - IND VERSUS KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK
RATUL PURI VERSUS DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Rohit Tandon :Versus: The Enforcement Directorate
RASHMI CEMENT LIMITED Vs. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE
GAUTAM KUNDU Vs. MANOJ KUMAR ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, EASTERN REGION, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT (PREV
Smt. Nandani Ramchandani And Ors. Vs. The State Of U.P And Ors.
Section 3 of PML Act clearly speaks that whosoever directly or indirectly attempts to indulge or knowingly assists or knowingly is a party or is actually involved in any process or activity connected with the proceeds of the crime and projecting it as untainted property shall be guilty of the offences of money laundering. Therefore, it is crystal clear that the person who acquired the proceeds of crime is being helped by anybody directly or indirectly knowingly to convert that Full Judgment
CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION versus UNION OF INDIA DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
- 1
- 2
- Next
- Last