Judgments - Land Acquisition
Union of India VERSUS Dyagala Devamma & Ors
Surendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid Down - Simple self-serving statement that the petitioners are social workers is not sufficient to invoke the public interest writ jurisdiction of this Court unless the petitioners are able to produce on record to the satisfaction of the Court such social work in last couple of years is in the area in respect of which the public interest writ petition is filed. Public interest litigation in respect of acquisition of land at the instance of third person would not be Full Judgment
Bhagwanti Bai Vs. State of MP & Others
Law Laid down - The Madhya Pradesh Bhumigat Pipe Line, Cable Evam Duct (Bhumi Ki Upyokta Ke Adhikaron Ka Arjan) Adhiniyam, 2012” [for short the ‘State Act’] is an Act enacted in pursuance of Entry 5, 6 and 17 of List II, of the 7th Schedule, and not in terms of Entry 43 of List III of the 7th Schedule. Therefore, the State Act is not repugnant to the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Full Judgment
Telangana Housing Board versus Azamunnisa Begum (Died) Thru. Lrs. & Ors.
Shiv Singh & Ors. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
Manimegalai Versus The Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition Officer) Adi Dravidar Welfare
Mohammad Yusuf and Others Etc. Etc Versus State of Haryana and Others.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Full Judgment
ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS. Versus SHIBU BODHAK & ORS.
SH. DHANPAL Vs. LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND ANR
R. S. Ashatkar Versus Central Bureau of Investigation, Bhopal
Rameshwar & Others VERSUS State of Haryana & Others
Sivakami & Ors. VERSUS State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
State of Punjab and Ors. Versus Thuru Ram
BHARATSING S/O GULABSINGH JAKHAD & ORS. VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY VERSUS SHAILENDRA (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.
H. N. Jagannath & Ors. Versus State of Karnataka & Ors
Shushila Bai & 6 Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & 4 Others
Munawwar Ali & others Versus Union of India & others
Law Laid Down - Merely because a person has a locus standi to file the writ petition, does not mean that he is entitled to any equitable or legal relief in writ jurisdiction. Equitable relief on the ground of adverse possession against the State - Negated. Supreme Court judgments reported as (2000) 5 SCC 652 (State of Rajasthan vs. Harphool Singh); (2011) 10 SCC 404 (State of Haryana vs. Mukesh Kumar) and (2014) 1 SCC 669 (Gurdwara Sahib vs. Gram Panchayat Village Full Judgment