Judgments - Land Acquisition
ER. K. ARUMUGAM VERSUS V. BALAKRISHNAN & ORS
Hori Lal VERSUS State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
DELHI DAYALBAGH COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD VERSUS REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ORS.
Nagpur Improvement Trust & Ors. Versus M/s Bombaywala & Ors
Wazir & Anr. VERSUS State of Haryana
Mallappa Dead by L.Rs. & Ors. VERSUS The Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr
BANGALORE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AREA PLANNING AUTHORITY VERSUS BIRLA SUPER BULK TERMINAL (NOW A UNIT OF ULTRA TECH CEMENT LTD.) AND ORS.
E.A. ABOOBACKER & ORS. Versus STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
Bangalore Development Authority VERSUS B.N. Ramalingaswamy & Ors
Mysore Urban Development Authority VERSUS K.M. Chikkathayamma & Ors.
N K JAIN Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
K.S. Rajan (D) through LRs VERSUS The State of Kerala & Anr
Pimpri Chinchwad New Township Development Authority Versus Vishnudev Cooperative Housing Society & Ors.
Union of India VERSUS Dyagala Devamma & Ors
Surendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid Down - Simple self-serving statement that the petitioners are social workers is not sufficient to invoke the public interest writ jurisdiction of this Court unless the petitioners are able to produce on record to the satisfaction of the Court such social work in last couple of years is in the area in respect of which the public interest writ petition is filed. Public interest litigation in respect of acquisition of land at the instance of third person would not be Full Judgment
Bhagwanti Bai Vs. State of MP & Others
Law Laid down - The Madhya Pradesh Bhumigat Pipe Line, Cable Evam Duct (Bhumi Ki Upyokta Ke Adhikaron Ka Arjan) Adhiniyam, 2012” [for short the ‘State Act’] is an Act enacted in pursuance of Entry 5, 6 and 17 of List II, of the 7th Schedule, and not in terms of Entry 43 of List III of the 7th Schedule. Therefore, the State Act is not repugnant to the The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Full Judgment