Judgments - Interpretation
TARA SINGH AND ORS Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. - NDPS
STAR SPORTS INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. PRASAR BHARTI & ORS.
MODERN DENTAL COLLEGE & RES.CEN. & ORS. Vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
R.B. Rai vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
27. Thus, taking overall view of the matter, the existing provision relating to reservation, backlog vacancies, carryforward of backlog vacancies and the operation of roster, contained in the Rules of 2002 runs contrary to the constitutional provisions contained in clause (4A) and (4B) of Article 16 and Article 335 of the Constitution and the law predicated in M. Nagaraj (supra), are declared ultra vires and non-est in law. 28. Consequently, various promotions of SCs/STs category made on the basis of these Full Judgment
VERHOEVEN, MARIE-EMMANUELLE Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2. The principal question for consideration is whether there is a binding extradition treaty in terms of Section 2(d) of the Extradition Act, 1962 between India and Chile. Our answer to this question is in the affirmative. 3. The subsidiary question, equally important, is assuming there is no binding extradition treaty between India and Chile, whether Full Judgment
ITC LIMITED GURGAON Vs. COMMR.OF I.T(TDS) DELHI
AXIS BANK Vs. SBS ORGANICS PVT. LTD & ANR.
Hindu Personal Law Board Through Asok Pande V/s Union of India through Cabinet Secretary, Government of India & Ors
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. V.N. PUBLIC HEALTH AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST & ORS
The application for grant of approval was filed with the Essentiality Certificate which was a conditional one and, therefore, a defective one. It was not an Essentiality Certificate in law. In such a situation, the High Court could not have directed for consideration of the application for the purpose of the inspection. Such a direction, we are disposed to think, runs counter to the law Full Judgment
MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs. CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE VELLORE & ORS
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Based on the interpretation placed by us on Section 4A(4) of the MMDR Act, and Rule 28 of the Mineral Concession Rules, we can draw the following conclusions. Firstly, unless an order is passed by the State Government declaring, that a mining lease has lapsed, the mining lease would be deemed to be subsisting, up to the date of expiry of the Full Judgment
LILAWATI AGARWAL (DEAD) BY LRS. & ORS. Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
STATE OF U.P.& ANR. Vs. M/S AL FAHEEM MEETEX P.LTD. & ANR.
N.VENKATESHAPPA Vs. MUNEMMA & ORS.
MUKUND DEWANGAN Vs. ORIENTAL INS.CO.LTD.
RE-INHUMAN CONDITIONS IN 1382 PRISONS VS Vs.
SURESH NARAYAN KADAM & ORS. Vs. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.
POOJA PAL Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
This Court in Babubhai (supra) while examining the scope of Section 173(8) of the Code, did recall its observations in Manu Sharma vs. State (NCT of Delhi), (2010) 6 SCC 1, that it is not only the responsibility of the investigating agency but as well as of the courts to ensure, that investigation is fair and does not in any way hamper the Full Judgment