Judgments - Interpretation
GOVINDASWAMY Vs. STATE OF KERALA
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Vs. SUKHBIR SINGH & ORS
DHARIWAL INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. KISHORE WADHWANI & ORS
PRABHU CHAWLA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS(P) LTD. & ANR. Vs. ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
ASHIQ HUSSAIN FAKTOO Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The principle of ex debito justitiae is founded on a recognition of a debt that the justice delivery system owes to a litigant to correct an error in a judicial dispensation. Its application, by the very nature of things, cannot be made to depend on varying perceptions of legal omissions and commissions but such recognition of the debt which have the potential of opening new vistas of Full Judgment
STATE OF U.P AND ORS. Vs. DR. DINESH SINGH CHAUHAN
30. As aforesaid, Regulations have been framed by an Expert Body based on past experience and including the necessity to reckon the services and experience gained by the in-service candidates in notified remote and difficult areas in the State. The proviso prescribes the measure for giving incentive marks to in-service candidates who have worked in notified remote and Full Judgment
VIJAY KUMAR MISHRA AND ANR Vs. HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA TO AND ORS
ARVIND KUMAR Vs. STATE OF U.P.& ORS.
CCE,AHMEDABAD Vs. M/S GUJARAT AMBUJA EXPORTS LTD.
The issue involved in the present appeal is whether the respondent/assessee is entitled to avail the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus dated 01.03.2002 read with Notification No. 66/2004-Cus dated 09.07.2004 for import of crude palm oil (non-edible grade) which is not used in the manufacture of Industrial Fatty Acid whereas the assessee is using the same for manufacturing the refined edible oil. In the instant Full Judgment
SWAMI ACHYUTANAND TIRTH & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The present writ petition is filed in public interest by the petitioners highlighting the menace of growing sales of adulterated and synthetic milk in different parts of the country. Considering the seriousness of the matter and in the light of various orders passed by this Court, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the following directions and observations:- i. Full Judgment
LOK PRAHARI Vs. STATE OF U.P. & ORS.
SANTOSH SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
There is a tendency on the part of public interest petitioners to assume that every good thing which society should aspire to achieve can be achieved through the instrumentality of the court. The judicial process provides remedies for constitutional or legal infractions. Public interest litigation allows a relaxation of the strict rules of locus standi. However, the court must necessarily abide Full Judgment
AVTAR SINGH Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
MUTHURAMALINGAM & ORS. Vs. STATE REP.BY INSP.OF POLICE
“Whether consecutive life sentences can be awarded to a convict on being found guilty of a series of murders for which he has been tried in a single trial?.” 17. The legal position is, thus, fairly well settled that imprisonment for life is a sentence for the remainder of the life of the offender unless of course the remaining sentence is commuted or remitted by the competent authority. That being Full Judgment
BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET Vs. CRICKET AASOCIATION OF BIHAR & ORS.
V. VASANTHAKUMAR Vs. H.C. BHATIA AND ORS
In view of cases pending in the Supreme Court of India on average for about 5 years, in the High Courts again for about 8 years, and anywhere between 5- 10 years in the Trial Courts on the average, would it not be part of the responsibility and duty of the Supreme Court of India to examine through a Constitution Bench, the issue of divesting the Supreme Court of about 80% of the pendency of Full Judgment