Judgments - Guardianship
SOUMITRA KUMAR NAHAR VERSUS PARUL NAHAR
YASHITA SAHU VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
Jasmeet Kaur versus State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
Smt. Roshni @ Roshan Vs. State of M.P.
BHAGWAN DAS VERSU THE STATE & ORS
SHEOLI HATI VERSUS SOMNATH DAS
TEJASWINI GAUD AND ORS. VERSUS SHEKHAR JAGDISH PRASAD TEWARI AND OTHERS
LAHARI SAKHAMURI VERSUS SOBHAN KODALI
PERRY KANSAGRA VERSUS SMRITI MADAN KANSAGRA
Mrinal Mallik Versus Jagannath Dey & Others
PURVI MUKESH GADA VERSUS MUKESH POPATLAL GADA & ANR.
JITENDER ARORA & ORS. Vs. SUKRITI ARORA & ORS.
She has developed her personality and formed her opinion after considering all the attendant circumstances. Her intellectual characteristics are adequately developed. She is able to solve problems, think about her future and understands the long term effects of the decision which she has taken. We also find Full Judgment
VIVEK SINGH Vs. ROMANI SINGH
HARSHITA BHASIN Vs. STATE OF W.B & ORS
SURYA VADANAN Vs. STATE OF TAMILNADU & ORS
The question before us relates to the refusal by the Madras High Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus for the production of the children of Surya Vadanan and Mayura Vadanan. The appellant sought their production to enable him to take the children with him to the U.K. since they were wards of the court in the U.K. to enable the foreign court to decide the issue of their custody. The principle Full Judgment
ROXANN SHARMA Vs. ARUN SHARMA
There can be no cavil that when a Court is confronted by conflicting claims of custody there are no rights of the parents which have to be enforced; the child is not a chattel or a ball that is bounced to and fro the parents. It is only the child's welfare which is the focal point for consideration. Full Judgment