Judgments - Forgery and Cheating
HARDEI Vs. STATE OF U.P.
It is well accepted in criminal jurisprudence that F.I.R. may not contain all the details of the occurrence or even the names of all the accused. It is not expected to be an encyclopedia even of facts already known. There are varities of crimes and by their very nature, details of some crimes can be unfolded only by a detailed and expert investigation. This is more true in crimes involving conspiracy, economic offences Full Judgment
M/S. V.L.S. FINANCE LTD. Vs. S.P. GUPTA AND ANR
BABU LAL AGGARWAL Vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
P S SHETTY Vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
In Re Vs Ajai Kumar Bhardwaj (Advocate)
Sheo Pratap Pandey Vs State Of U.P.And Another
JASBIR SINGH Vs. TARA SINGH & ORS
Abdul Sattar Vs State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Home Civil Sectt.&Ors.
Durga Ram Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others Respondents
Sushil Kumar Rastogi @ Sushil Kumar Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Ors
TEESTA ATUL SETALVAD AND ANR. Vs. STATE OF GUJARAT
the question that arises for consideration is whether liberty on the one hand and fair and effective investigation on the other, make out a case for extending the benefit under Section 438 CrPC. Needless to say "Liberty is to the collective body, what health is to every individual body. Without health, no pleasure can be tasted by man; without liberty, no happiness can be enjoyed by society. Having stated about the Full Judgment
Sonu Gupta Versus Deepak Gupta & Ors.
-At the stage of cognizance and summoning the Magistrate is required to apply his judicial mind only with a view to take cognizance of the offence, or, in other words, to find out whether prima facie case has been made out for summoning the accused persons. At this stage, the learned Magistrate is not required to consider the defence version or materials or Full Judgment