Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Civil Revision, 300
of 2018, Judgment Date: May 16, 2018
Law laid down -
Revision against the order passed in an election petition under the M.P. Municipalities Act, 1961, Security deposit alongwith memo of Revision Petition under Rule 19(2) of Rules 1962 is mandatory. Security amount has to be deposited alongwith the revision petition. High Court has no discretion to condone the latches. Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Special Leave Petition (Civil), 9968
of 2018, Judgment Date: May 09, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 649
of 2018, Judgment Date: Apr 27, 2018
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPC->WRIT PETITION ALL ORDERS CIVIL [ RELATED TO OTHER MATTER ], 472
of 2018, Judgment Date: Apr 13, 2018
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPC->WRIT PETITION ALL ORDERS CIVIL [ RELATED TO OTHER MATTER ], 43
of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 19, 2018
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
WPC->WRIT PETITION ALL ORDERS CIVIL [ RELATED TO OTHER MATTER ], 471
of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 13, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 10863
of 2017, Judgment Date: Mar 08, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1200
of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 06, 2018
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
Appeal (Civil), 1763
of 2018, Judgment Date: Mar 06, 2018
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
EL.PET., 20
of 2009, Judgment Date: Dec 20, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
EP, 31
of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 20, 2017
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
WA, 648
of 2017, Judgment Date: Nov 09, 2017
Law laid down -
The removal or disqualification of an elected representative has serious repercussion, therefore, elected representative must not be removed unless a clear-cut case is made out.
The requirement of furnishing of election expenses is a step to ensure proper maintenance of accounts. Such condition is only a procedure to achieve the said object, thus, not a mandatory condition. The technicality of non-opening of bank account for incurring the election expenses through the bank account cannot be a ground to Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
EP, 15
of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 03, 2017
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Special Leave Petition (Civil), 18336
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 28, 2017
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
EP->ELECTION PETITION, 2
of 2014, Judgment Date: Jul 21, 2017
Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
W.P.(C), 5825
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 14, 2017
Full Judgment
Gauhati High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Writ Appeal, 188
of 2017, Judgment Date: Jul 10, 2017
Full Judgment
Bombay High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
APEAL, 5393
of 2016, Judgment Date: Jun 07, 2017
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
EP->ELECTION PETITION, 6
of 2014, Judgment Date: May 18, 2017
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
EP->ELECTION PETITION, 6
of 2014, Judgment Date: May 18, 2017
Full Judgment
