Judgments - Disproportionate Assets
PUNEET SABHARWAL Versus CBI
THANESAR SINGH SODHI (D) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
STATE OF KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTA POLICE VERSUS S. SUBBEGOWDA
STATE THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VERSUS HEMENDHRA REDDY & ANOTHER. ETC.
THE STATE OF CHATTISGARH & ANR. VS. AMAN KUMAR SINGH
Dr. Mayank Jain Versus Special Police Establishment Lokayukt
Menon Ekka @ Smt. Menon Ujjana Ekka Versus Union of India
VIJAY RAJMOHAN VERSUS STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, ACB, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU
KANCHAN KUMAR VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR
STATE BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VERSUS R. SOUNDIRARASU ETC.
THE STATE BY S.P. THROUGH THE SPE CBI VERSUS UTTAMCHAND BOHRA
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Anr. Versus Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi @ T. H. Vijayalakshmi and Anr.
Bhima Razu Prasad Versus State Rep. By Deputy Superintendent Of Police Cbi/Spe/Acu
THE STATE OF TELANGANA VERSUS SRI MANAGIPET @ MANGIPET SARVESHWAR REDDY
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. VERSUS GAUTAM KHAITAN
STATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION VERSUS M. SUBRAHMANYAM
State by Lokayuktha Police Versus H. Srinivas
Radhey Shyam Yadav Vs. State Of U.P.
KEDARI LAL Vs. STATE OF MP
The expression "known sources of income" in Section 13(1) (e) of the Act has two elements, first the income must be received from a lawful source and secondly the receipt of such income must have been intimated in accordance with the provisions of law, rules or orders for the time being applicable to the public servant. The categories so enumerated are illustrative. Receipt by way of share Full Judgment
AKHILESH YADAV VS VISHWANATH CHATURVEDI & ORS
The scope of a review petition is very limited and the submissions advanced were made mainly on questions of fact. As has been repeatedly indicated by this Court, review of a judgment on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record is permissible, but an error apparent on the face of the record has to be decided on the facts of each Full Judgment