Filter by Date
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICE SELECTION BOARD VERSUS DR SATYA PRAKASH GAUTAM & ANR

W.P.(CRL), 667 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jun 14, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

B.M. SHARMA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR

W.P.(C), 4896 of 2021, Judgment Date: May 12, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

BISHAN SWAROOP VERSUS MAHENDER KUMAR PANDEY

CM(M), 323 of 2021, Judgment Date: Apr 16, 2021

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

Lt. Col. Nitisha & Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors.

Blank Writ Petition (Civil), 1109 of 2020, Judgment Date: Mar 25, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

DISHA A. RAVI VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS

W.P.(C), 2297 of 2021, Judgment Date: Feb 19, 2021

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RITU GARG AND ORS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ANR

W.P.(C), 1178 of 2021, Judgment Date: Jan 29, 2021

Full Judgment

Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)

Lala @ Daneshwar Versus State of Chhattisgarh

CRMP->CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION, 65 of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 04, 2021

Criminal courts should not issue non-bailable warrant of arrest straightway at the first instance and investigating officer should inform the accused about filing of charge-sheet specially when he is on bail Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

PRAVEEN KUMAR @ PRASHANT VERSUS STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI & ORS

CRL.A., 667 of 2018, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2020

Full Judgment

Delhi High Court (Single Judge)

PRAVEEN KUMAR @ PRASHANT VERSUS STATE & ORS

CRL.A., 817 of 2018, Judgment Date: Apr 28, 2020

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

RELIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Appeal (Civil), 879 of 2019, Judgment Date: Jan 21, 2019

Full Judgment

Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)

STATE OF MP. & ORS. Vs. MALA BANERJEE

Appeal (Civil), 2944 of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 17, 2015

3 Very briefly stated, the dispute pertains to the eligibility of the Respondents, all of whom are Lecturers/Teachers in the employment of the Education and Tribal Welfare Department, Government of Madhya Pradesh, for increased pay scales. The Respondents claim the benefits of the Kramonnati Scheme with effect from 19.4.1999, whereas the Appellants assert that they are willing to grant the benefit of the Kramonnati Scheme Full Judgment