Judgments - Death Sentence
Asar Mohammad and Ors. :Versus: The State of U.P
Vinod alias Rahul Chouhtha - V/s - State of Madhya Pradesh P.S. Kotwali, Shahdol (M.P.)
Law Laid Down: The opinion of an expert is admissible in evidence u/S 293 of the CrPC and therefore, cannot be discarded on the basis of books on Medical Jurisprudence unless the passages which are sought to be discredited in the opinion of the expert are put to him - Judgments relied - AIR 1975 SC 905 (Phool Kumar vs. Delhi Administration) and AIR 1957 SC 589 (Bhagwan Das and another vs. State of Rajasthan). A DNA report must be accepted as scientifically Full Judgment
MUKESH VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
VINAY SHARMA & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
STATE OF M.P. Vs. Munna @ Shahnwaj
In Reference Received from Second Addl. Sessions Judge, Chhatarpur Vs. Bhagchandra
Bhagchandra Vs State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - (i) Evidence of related eye-witnesses can be relied upon for conviction. (ii) Non-compliance of Section 157 of Cr.P.C. cannot prove fatal for the prosecution if the case is duly established against the accused. (iii) Keeping in view the heinous and brutal nature of murder of more than one person, now-a-days death sentence is essential. Full Judgment
KRISHNA S/O RAMRAO RIDDE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
State of Madhya Pradesh Versus Aamin & others
State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Aamin & others
SONU SARDAR Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR
DHAL SINGH DEWANGAN Vs. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
TATTU LODHI @ PANCHAM LODHI Vs. STATE OF M.P
GOVINDASWAMY Vs. STATE OF KERALA
State of Chhattisgarh Vs . Sunil @ Balikaran Sahu & Anr.
UNION OF INDIA Vs. V. SRIHARAN @ ,MURUGAN & ORS.
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMON Vs. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
SHABNAM Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
The present writ petitions are filed on the allegations that on 21.05.2015, death warrants have been issued by the learned Sessions Judge, which are impermissible inasmuch as various remedies which are available to the convicts, even after the dismissal of the appeals by this Court, are still open and yet to be exercised by them. It is submitted that these convicts can file review petition seeking review of Full Judgment