Judgments - Death Sentence
ANUJ KUMAR GUPTA @ SETHI GUPTA Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF BIHAR, OLD SECRETARIAT, PATNA
BHAGCHANDRA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
JASBIR SINGH @ JASSA ETC. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS
Hari & Anr. Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh
Mofil Khan & Anr. Versus The State of Jharkhand
IRAPPA SIDDAPPA MURGANNAVAR VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA
The State of Bihar Versus Taslim (Name changed)
DURGAWATI DEVI Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR
State of M.P. v/s. Irfan & Anr.
Law laid down - Held: Conviction and sentence of appellants under Section 376(DB) of IPC – (i) Prosecutrix, a child of seven years of age was proved to have been subjected to violent gang rape by appellants and prosecutrix was also inflicted life-threatening injuries. (Significant paragraph nos. – 46 to 51) (ii) Conviction under Section 376(DB) of IPC and sentence of hanging by trial Court – Affirmed – Sentencing Policy Discussed – Legislature has imposed death penalty in incidents of child sexual abuse Full Judgment
Ravi @ Toli Vs. State of M.P.
In. Ref. (Suo Moto) Vs. Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath
Yogesh Nath @ Jogesh Nath Vs. The State of MP
In Reference (Suo Moto) Vs. Manoj
State of M.P. Vs. Nandu @ Nandkishore Gupta
HARI OM @ HERO VERSUS STATE OF U.P.
PAWAN KUMAR GUPTA Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI - 20/03/2020
The alleged torture, if any, in the prison cannot be a ground for judicial review of the executive order passed under Article 72 of the Constitution of India rejecting the mercy petition. When the power is vested in the very high constitutional authority, it must be presumed that the said authority had acted carefully after considering all the aspects of the matter.It cannot be said that His Excellency the President of India did not consider the mercy petition with open mind Full Judgment