Judgments - Copyright
Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited versus Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana
M/s Knit Pro International Versus The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
SHYAM SEL AND POWER LIMITED AND ANOTHER VERSUS SHYAM STEEL INDUSTRIES LIMITED
RENAISSANCE HOTEL HOLDINGS INC. VERSUS B. VIJAYA SAI AND OTHERS
SHRI RISHI RAJ VERSUS SAREGAMA INDIA LTD.
WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC VERSUS SUMIT PANDEY AND OTHERS
Saregama India Limited Versus Next Radio Limited & Ors
COLORBAR COSMETICS PVT. LTD. VERSUS DEEPAK JAIN & ORS
Shiva Poly Tubes Pvt. Ltd. and Ors Vs. State Of Bihar and Anr
Curewin Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. vs. Curewin Hylico Pharma Pvt. Ltd.
Law laid down - 1) Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - The provision is clear and unambiguous that a suit which is not pregnant with any such interim relief under the act cannot be instituted unless the plaintiff exhausts the remedy of pre-institutional mediation (para no.11). 2) Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 - The purpose of insertion of section 12-A is to encourage the parties to try and resolve their disputes amicably in mediation process. But Commercial Court Full Judgment
SHANMUGAM VERSUS STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU
JAGMOHAN RATRA VERSUS AMPA CYCLES PVT. LTD. & ANR
KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD. & ANR VERSUS JAIDEEP KISHNANI & ORS
NATURES ESSENCE PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS PROTOGREEN RETAIL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED & OR
M/s.Mold Tek Packing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. S.D.Containers
Law laid down - Section 22 (4) of the Designs Act, 2000 – Civil Suit – Civil Suit is directed to be decided by Indore Bench of High Court by judgment of Supreme Court dated December 01, 2020. The parties have taken diametrically opposite view as to which bench can try the said civil suit. The plaintiff urged that civil suit needs to be decided by a commercial appellate division constituted u/S.5 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 whereas other side Full Judgment
Praveen Muraka S/o Shri Gokuldas Murarka vs. Bhama Enterprises India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Law laid down - The Designs Act, 2000 – It seeks to provide and ensure effective protection to registered designs. It is also required to promote design activity in order to promote the “design element” in an article of production. Section 4 of Designs Act- A plaintiff can institute a suit impugning the other product if the said product is neither new nor significantly distinguishable. Section 4 of Designs Act – The test to examine whether the impugned product is 'new or original', Full Judgment