Judgments - Compassionate Appointment
NRIPEN KALITA VS STATE OF ASSAM & 3 ORS
SHRI LAKHYAJIT BORUAH VS THE STATE OF ASSAM & 4 ORS
MUKESH & ANR. Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
Compassionate appointments are not a source of recruitment and they are made to provide succour to the family of an employee who dies in harness. Full Judgment
Smt. Shitala Diwan Versus State of Chhattisgarh Oth.
Jitendra Vs. State of M.P. and others
In these petitions, the pivotal question needs consideration is whether a reserve category candidate is entitled to be considered for compassionate appointment against a General category post ? In the opinion of this court, the reserve category candidate is also entitled to be considered against a General category post. The only requirement is that such candidate should be eligible in all respect as if he is a general category candidate except the caste. In my view, the test should be that Full Judgment
Arun Kumar V/s State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Prajesh Shrivastava V/s State of M.P. and others
MD ZAMIL AHMED Vs. STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
Nitesh Kumar Mishra Vs State Of U.P. Through Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. & Ors.
Pavan Kumar Singh Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Othres
CANARA BANK & ANR. Vs. M. MAHESH KUMAR
Common question of law falling for consideration in these civil appeals is whether the dependant family members of the deceased employee of the appellant-Canara Bank were entitled to seek compassionate appointment on the basis of ‘Dying in Harness Scheme’ which was passed Vide Circular No.154/1993 w.e.f. 8.05.1993. (i) Compassionate employment cannot be made in the absence of rules or regulations issued by the Government or a public authority. The request Full Judgment
THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & OTHERS Vs. REVAT SINGH
Fixing eligibility for a particular post or even for admission to a course falls within the exclusive domain of the legislature/executive and cannot be the subject-matter of judicial review, unless found to Full Judgment