Judgments - Charge
High Court Bar Association, Allahabad versus State of U.P.
STATE THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE CBI CHENNAI VS. NARESH PRASAD AGARWAL
Central Bureau of Investigation versus Narottam Dhakad
Deepak Garg Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
IC 56663X COL ANIL KUMAR GUPTA VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
VIJAY RAJMOHAN VERSUS STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CBI, ACB, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU
KANCHAN KUMAR VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR
Ku. Shiva Bhadoriya Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh
STATE BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VERSUS R. SOUNDIRARASU ETC.
P. VIJAY NATARAJ & ORS. VERSUS STATE & ANR.
PUSHPENDRA KUMAR SINHA VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND
M.P. Poorv Kshetra Vidyut Vitaranj Company Ltd. Versus K.K. Mishra
J.B.S. Chandel Vs. State of M.P.
Law laid down - The object of giving protection under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure-- To take sanction for initiating prosecution against public servant for protecting them from needless harassment so as to render protective assurance to honest officer to perform public duty honestly and to best of their abilities because threat of prosecution demoralises the honest officer. Real test to determine applicability of Section 197 of Cr.C.P. and obtaining sanction from the Government are:- (i) That the accused must be a Full Judgment
THE STATE BY S.P. THROUGH THE SPE CBI VERSUS UTTAMCHAND BOHRA
THWAHA FASAL VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
Tarun Kumar Mishra Versus State of M.P. & Ors.
Law laid down - As per the provisions of Rule 14 of MP Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1966, the disciplinary authority has to apply its mind separately at two different stages, (i) initiation of proceeding and (ii) approval of charge-sheet. It is not enough that if the disciplinary authority has formed an opinion to initiate the disciplinary proceeding and signed it, but for issuance of charge-sheet it would not be required to sign it by the disciplinary authority. Full Judgment
Rajendra Kumar Gautam Vs. State of MP
Law laid down - 1. Departmental inquiry and FIR/Criminal case based on same facts/incident – In every case, it cannot be said as a rule of thumb that exoneration in departmental enquiry on merits must result into setting aside of FIR. If it is found on merits that there is no contravention of the provision of the Act in the departmental inquiry, the continuance of trial of person concerned can be treated as an abuse of the process of the Court. 2. Full Judgment
NATIONAL GANDHI MUSEUM VS. SUDHIR SHARMA
SAURABH SHARMA VERSUS SUB-DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (EAST) & ORS
A vehicle which is moving across the city, even if occupied at a given point in time by one person, would be a public place owing to the immediate risk of exposure to other persons under varying circumstances. Thus, a vehicle even if occupied by only one person would constitute a ‘public place’ and wearing of a mask therein, would be compulsory. The wearing of a mask or a face cover in a vehicle, which may be occupied by either Full Judgment