Judgments - Bail
KAMLA DEVI VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
Serious Fraud Investigation Office Versus Rahul Modi & Ors.
Sunil Kumar Versus The State of Bihar and Anr.
Manno Lal Jaiswal Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Ishwarji Nagaji Mali Versus State of Gujarat and another
JAIBUNISHA VERSUS MEHARBAN & ANR.
MANOJ KUMAR KHOKHAR VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR.
BRIJMANI DEVI VERSUS PAPPU KUMAR & ANR.
BHARAT CHAUDHARY VERSUS UNION OF INDIA
Laxman Prasad Pandey Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
The State of M. P. vs. Sanjay
Law laid down - Where the minimum sentence is less than 10 years but the maximum sentence is not death or life imprisonment then Section 167 (2) (a) (ii) will apply and the accused will be entitled to grant of “default bail” after 60 days in case charge-sheet is not filed. In view of the same, since the maximum sentence provided u/s.467 of IPC is life imprisonment, regardless that the minimum sentence is less then 10 years, the period of filing Full Judgment
SAMI ULLAH & ORS. ETC. VERSUS ZULFIKAR NASIR & ORS. ETC.
Mrs. Prachi Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - 1. Very cogent and overwhelming circumstances are necessary for an order directing cancellation of the bail, already granted. 2. The concept of setting aside the unjustified, illegal or perverse order is totally different from the concept of cancelling the bail on the ground that accused has misconducted himself or because of some new facts requiring such cancellation. 3. Applicant should first move the Court concerned for cancellation of bail bringing out the circumstances as have been mentioned in Annexure Full Judgment