Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4801
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4802
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4803
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4808
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4810
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 3688
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 09, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE, 4568
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4569
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4572
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
BAIL, 4574
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 08, 2015
Full Judgment
Allahabad High Court (Single Judge)
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION, 19189
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jun 01, 2015
Full Judgment
Chhatisgarh High Court (Single Judge)
MCRC->MISC. CRIMINAL CASE, 1782
of 2015, Judgment Date: May 15, 2015
Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
CRA, 2156
of 2009, Judgment Date: Apr 24, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 338
of 2015, Judgment Date: Mar 19, 2015
the question that arises for
consideration is whether liberty on the one hand and fair and effective
investigation on the other, make out a case for extending the benefit under
Section 438 CrPC.
Needless to say "Liberty is to the collective body, what health is to
every individual body. Without health, no pleasure can be tasted by man;
without liberty, no happiness can be enjoyed by society.
Having stated about the Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 325
of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 20, 2015
In State of M.P. v. Rustam and others[5], this Court has laid down the
law that while computing period of ninety days, the day on which the
accused was remanded to the judicial custody should be excluded, and
the day on which challan is filed in the court, should be included.
That being Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2015
of 2015, Judgment Date: Feb 04, 2015
It is well settled that at pre-conviction stage, there is presumption
of innocence. The object of keeping a person in custody is to ensure his
availability to face the trial and to receive the sentence that may be
passed. The detention is not supposed to be punitive or preventive.
Seriousness of the allegation or the availability of material in support
thereof Full Judgment
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
MCRC, 1015
of 2015, Judgment Date: Jan 23, 2015
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2587
of 2014, Judgment Date: Dec 16, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2587 Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 2446-2447
of 2014, Judgment Date: Nov 19, 2014
Full Judgment
Supreme Court of India (Division Bench (DB)- Two Judge)
Appeal (Crl.), 1533-1534
of 2005, Judgment Date: Dec 14, 2012
Full Judgment
