Judgments - Bail
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
PANKAJ KUMAR VERSUS THE STATE
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
AKSHAY KANOTRA VERSUS STATE
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
MANINDER SINGH VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Vishal Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Exception 2 of Section 375 of IPC is irrational. Marriageable age in India is 18 years, giving consent for sexual intercourse is also 18 years. Exception is inconsistent with the provisions of POCSO Act. Definition of “Child” as per Section 2(1)(d) is below 18 years. The preamble also provides that “sexual exploitation and sexual abuse of children are heinous crimes and need to be effectively addressed” This is directly in conflict with Exception 2 of Section 375 of IPC. Section Full Judgment
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
SAMEER KHAN VERSUS THE STATE OF DELHI
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
GULFAM alias VIP VERSUS STATE
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
KAKE @ SANDEEP YADAV VERSUS THE STATE
Delhi High Court (Single Judge)
TANVEER MALIK VERSUS STATE
Supreme Court of India (Full Bench (FB)- Three Judge)
SUDHA SINGH VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR.
Tags Bail
Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge)
Nitin Khandelwal Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Tags Bail