Judgments - Appointment
SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD ASSOCIATION AND ANR. Vs. UNION OF INDIA
STATE OF UP AND ORS Vs. AJAY KUMAR SHARMA AND ANR
What then should be the position in regard to the effect of the law pronounced by a Division Bench in relation to a case raising the same point subsequently before a Division Bench of a smaller number of Judges? There is no constitutional or statutory prescription in the matter, and the point is governed entirely by the practice in India of the courts sanctified by repeated affirmation over a century of time. Full Judgment
PARVAIZ AHMAD PARRY Vs. STATE OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND ORS
In our view, if a candidate has done B.Sc. in Forestry as one of the major subjects and has also done Masters in the Forestry, i.e., M.Sc.(Forestry) then in the absence of any clarification on such issue, the candidate possessing such higher qualification has to be held to possess the required qualification to apply for the post. Full Judgment
DR.SYED TANVIR HUSSAIN Vs UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS.
Gorakhpur University Aff. College Teacher Asso. And Anr Vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
MADRAS INST.OF DEV. STUDIES & ANR. Vs. K. SIVASUBRAMANIYAN & ORS.
Abhilasha Mishra Vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others
Randhir Singh Vs State Of U.P. & 3 Others
CANARA BANK & ANR. Vs. M. MAHESH KUMAR
Common question of law falling for consideration in these civil appeals is whether the dependant family members of the deceased employee of the appellant-Canara Bank were entitled to seek compassionate appointment on the basis of ‘Dying in Harness Scheme’ which was passed Vide Circular No.154/1993 w.e.f. 8.05.1993. (i) Compassionate employment cannot be made in the absence of rules or regulations issued by the Government or a public authority. The request Full Judgment
Raeesul Hasan Vs. State Of U.P.Through Secy.Education And 5 Ors.
HC PRADEEP KUMAR RAI & ORS. Vs. DINESH KUMAR PANDEY & ORS.
K.RADHIKA Vs. T.RAJYA LAXMI & ORS.
It consists of innumerable errors. We only hope that it is not the desire of the High Court that such candidates are required to be appointed merely because they have the higher grade qualification. We, therefore, allow the appeal and set aside the judgment under appeal. Full Judgment
KHUB RAM Vs. DALBIR SINGH & ORS.
Mr. Patwalia has rightly placed reliance to support the aforesaid submissions, on a judgment of this Court in the case of Meghmala v. G. Narasimha Reddy (2010) 8 SCC 383. The law relating to effect of fraud upon a competent authority to get an appointment/office as well as effect of fraud upon court has been discussed in detail in paragraphs 28 to 36 Full Judgment
Ashish Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh & ors
The issue with which this Court is required to deal is whether nondisclosure of registration of a criminal case, in which the petitioner has already been acquitted would make him eligible for remaining in employment? 8. In the matter of Devendra Kumar Vs. State of Uttaranchan And Others1, the Supreme Court has held that issue of obtaining appointment by misrepresentation is no more res integra. The question is not whether the applicant is suitable for the post. Pendency of criminal Full Judgment
UMRALA GRAM PANCHAYAT Vs. THE SEC.MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEE UNION & ORS
They have also been working for similar number of hours, however, the discrepancy in the payment of wages/salary between the permanent and the non-permanent workmen is alarming and the same has to be construed as being an unfair labour practice as defined under Section 2(ra) of the ID Act r/w Entry No.10 of the Fifth Schedule to the ID Act, which is prohibited under Section 25(T) of the ID Full Judgment
T.NADU TERMD.FULL TIME TEM.LIC EMP.ASSN. Vs. LIFE INSURANCE CORP.OF INDIA & ORS.
The concerned workmen are the members of the appellant-Associations, Federation of Employees Association, Workers Association and other concerned individual workmen who were working in the branches of the Corporation at various places in the country have raised the existing industrial dispute between the concerned workmen and the management of Full Judgment
THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & OTHERS Vs. REVAT SINGH
Fixing eligibility for a particular post or even for admission to a course falls within the exclusive domain of the legislature/executive and cannot be the subject-matter of judicial review, unless found to Full Judgment
M. SURENDER REDDY Vs. GOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.
The questions that arise for determination in this case are: (a)whether G.O.Ms.124 dated 7th March, 2002 is retrospective in nature in order to make it applicable to the posts for which selection process has already started pursuant to 1999 advertisement, and (b) If the said G.O.Ms. is retrospective, whether it is required to review the entire select Full Judgment