Judgments - Appointment
Laxminarayan Agrawal Versus Smt. Kalpana Pandey
Mukesh Kumar Umar & Another Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Bagherwal Versus Chhattisgarh Kamdhenu
Yogesh Mahajan Versus Prof. R.C. Deka, Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
SHRI BAIDYA NATH YADAV & ORS. Vs. GURU TEGH BAHADUR POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE & ANR.
SH. HARI KISHORE SHARMA Vs. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Sunita Singh Versus State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Ashutosh Pawar Vs. High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Another
Law Laid Down - * Decision of Criminal Court on the basis of compromise or an acquittal cannot be treated that the candidate possesses good character, which may make him eligible, as the criminal proceedings are with the view to find culpability of commission of offence whereas the appointment to the civil post is in view of his suitability to the post. The test for each of them is based upon different parameters and therefore, acquittal in a criminal case is Full Judgment
M/s Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited Vs. Northern Coal Field Limited
Law Laid Down - * Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 deals with the appointment of Arbitrator without the intervention of the Court whereas appointment with the intervention of the Court is contemplated under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act. * The limitation for filing a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act is contemplated by the Limitation Act particularly Article 137 of the Schedule-I of the Limitation Act, 1963. The limitation does not start from the notice but Full Judgment
UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ORS. Versus PRADEEP KUMAR AND ANOTHER
Caparo Engineering India Ltd Vs. Pradhanmantri Engineering Shramik Sanghthan
Committee of Management Versus The Director of Higher Education & Ors
PRADEEP KUMAR Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Common Cause Versus Union of India and Others
Ajit Singh Patel And 10 Others Vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others
MUSHARAF HUSSAIN VS THE STATE OF ASSAM & 3 ORS
MR. SACHIN GANPATI DAVANDE Vs THE CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED AND ORS
ENERGY WATCHDOG Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
MAHARASHTRA FOREST GUARDS AND FORESTERS UNION VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Sunaina Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors.
It is a settled principle of law that normally no person can be promoted with retrospective effect from a date when he was not born in the cadre. The normal rule is that a person is entitled to seniority only from the date when the said person actually joins the post. True it is, that there are exceptions and sometimes “in service”candidates can be granted promotion from a date anterior to their being regularly promoted/appointed.However, this canbe done only if the Full Judgment