Judgments - Appointment
MUKESH KUMAR VERMA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERS
Smt. Asha Kushwah Vs. State of M.P. and others
M/s Trans Asian Shipping Services (Pvt.) Ltd. VERSUS M/s Beacon Shipping Lines Ltd. by Mr. Mohammed S. Aslam Managing Director & others
Meena Verma VERSUS State of Himachal Pradesh and another
Referred Cases - 1. S. Chandramohan Nair Versus George Joseph and others Full Judgment
Hemlal Kol and Others Vs. The State of M.P. and Others
Prabhat Ranjan Singh & Anr. Versus R.K. Kushwaha & Ors.
GOTTUMUKKALA VENKATA KRISHAMRAJU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
BIR SINGH VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS.
MATHEWS MAR KOORILOS (DEAD) AND ANR. ETC Versus M. PAPPY (DEAD) AND ANOTHER ETC.
Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Versus Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others
Law Laid Down: The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new right Full Judgment
Amit Kumar Mishra Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
The scheme circulated by Madhya Pradesh State Employment Guarantee Council for appointment of Gram Rojgar Sahayak does not prescribe any condition that Gram Panchayat can add, modify or delete any of the conditions in the guidelines so framed and circulated. Though the Gram Panchayat is an independent juristic entity and third tier of governance but the funds are to be released by the State/M.P. Employment Guarantee Council. Therefore, the responsibility of the Gram Panchayat is to engage Gram Rojgar Sahayaks Full Judgment
COMMON CAUSE (A Regd. Society) & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Rashmi Boudh & others v. State of M.P. & others
Law Laid Down - Madhya Pradesh Junior Administrative Service (Recruitments and Service Conditions of Service) Rules, 2011 (for short “the 2011 Rules”) contemplate that the candidates should have served at least for five years as Patwari in permanent or officiating capacity. In terms of the Scheme of appointment and the 2011 Rules, the petitioners were appointed to the service only after completion of training and on qualifying the written examination. Therefore, the period prior to their appointment to the service cannot Full Judgment
Ramji Tiwari & others v. State of M.P. & others
Law Laid Down - No age is contemplated in respect of limited competitive examination either in Rule 6 or Rule 13 of Madhya Pradesh Junior Administrative Service (Recruitments and Service Conditions of Service) Rules, 2011 (“in short “the Rules”). Therefore, the Schedule-V of the Rules prescribing the age limit for filling of the posts of Naib Tehsildar from amongst the Patwaris or Revenue Inspectors is without any corresponding support from the substantive provisions of the Rules. In view of the said fact, Full Judgment
Dr. D.P. Singh & others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid Down - Even if there is a mistake in the advertisement in respect of available posts for general category or for reserved category candidates, that will not confer any cause of action upon the petitioners to dispute the selection process as the candidates have to be appointed in respect of posts available but generally not exceeding the posts advertised. The State would be well advised to calculate the backlog vacancies and to fill the seats keeping in view the advertisement Full Judgment
Dr. Avinash Mishra & others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Law Laid Down - The State has a right to assess the suitability of a candidate for appointment with or without interview. The State having exercised the jurisdiction in terms of Madhya Pradesh Educational Service (Collegiate Branch) Recruitment Rules, 1990 (for short “the 1990 Rules”), it cannot be said that power of relaxation to do away with the interview is illegal. In exercise of power of judicial review, this Court examines the jurisdiction to relax the Rules. Since there is explicit power Full Judgment
U.P.P.S.C., Through its Chairman & Anr. Versus Rahul Singh & Anr.
Dr. Saiyad Ghazanafar Ishtiaque Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Law laid down - 1. Once the petitioner appointed on the post of Unani Chikitsa Adhikari under Rule 6 of Madhya Pradesh Health Services (Recruitment) Rules 1967, which gives power to the State Government to appoint a person without consultation with Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission and said power is duly endorsed by Rule 3 of Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission (Limitation of Functions) Regulations, 1957 then the said appointment of petitioner would be treated as regular appointment. 2. Once the petitioner Full Judgment