Judgments - Appointment
Ku. Surabhi Baghel Versus High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur
Law laid down - Scope of interference – In academic matters in framing of questions, evaluation of answers and finalisation of model answers – the Court cannot and should not act as Court of appeal, but to leave the same to academicians and experts. Full Judgment
U.P. JAL NIGAM & ORS :Versus: AJIT SINGH PATEL & ORS
Hemant Bakolia Vs. State of MP & Ors.
Law laid down - Rounding off of the marks is not permissible contrary to the expressed language of the Rule containing the mandatory condition of obtaining atleast 50% marks in each paper. In a competitive examination each fraction of marks has a bearing on the result of the participating candidate and if in such a case rounding off of marks is allowed that will defeat the very principle of assessing comparative merit. No revaluation of answer sheet can be directed in the absence of any Full Judgment
S. Mahesh Versus The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Neyveli Tamil Nadu & Ors.
Saurabh Singh Baghel & Others Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & Others
Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission Versus Dr. Deepak Singh & others
TELANGANA JUDGES ASSOCIATION & ANR. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
MUKESH KUMAR VERMA VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERS
Smt. Asha Kushwah Vs. State of M.P. and others
M/s Trans Asian Shipping Services (Pvt.) Ltd. VERSUS M/s Beacon Shipping Lines Ltd. by Mr. Mohammed S. Aslam Managing Director & others
Meena Verma VERSUS State of Himachal Pradesh and another
Referred Cases - 1. S. Chandramohan Nair Versus George Joseph and others Full Judgment
Hemlal Kol and Others Vs. The State of M.P. and Others
Prabhat Ranjan Singh & Anr. Versus R.K. Kushwaha & Ors.
GOTTUMUKKALA VENKATA KRISHAMRAJU VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
BIR SINGH VERSUS DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS.
MATHEWS MAR KOORILOS (DEAD) AND ANR. ETC Versus M. PAPPY (DEAD) AND ANOTHER ETC.
Dr. Vandana Rajoriya Versus Dr. Hari Singh Gour University, Sagar and others
Law Laid Down: The UGC Regulations 2009 have not envisaged any situation for the candidates who were registered for Ph.D. Degree Programme prior to 11.07.2009. Such situation was addressed effectively only when a Notification was published on 11.07.2016 called as the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for Appointment of Teachers and other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education) (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016. Such Regulations 2016 are not creating any new right Full Judgment
Amit Kumar Mishra Versus State of Madhya Pradesh & others
The scheme circulated by Madhya Pradesh State Employment Guarantee Council for appointment of Gram Rojgar Sahayak does not prescribe any condition that Gram Panchayat can add, modify or delete any of the conditions in the guidelines so framed and circulated. Though the Gram Panchayat is an independent juristic entity and third tier of governance but the funds are to be released by the State/M.P. Employment Guarantee Council. Therefore, the responsibility of the Gram Panchayat is to engage Gram Rojgar Sahayaks Full Judgment
COMMON CAUSE (A Regd. Society) & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Rashmi Boudh & others v. State of M.P. & others
Law Laid Down - Madhya Pradesh Junior Administrative Service (Recruitments and Service Conditions of Service) Rules, 2011 (for short “the 2011 Rules”) contemplate that the candidates should have served at least for five years as Patwari in permanent or officiating capacity. In terms of the Scheme of appointment and the 2011 Rules, the petitioners were appointed to the service only after completion of training and on qualifying the written examination. Therefore, the period prior to their appointment to the service cannot Full Judgment