Judgments - Anticipatory bail
Chironjilal Kushwah Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down:- 1. Clause 16 of M.P. Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2015 does not contemplate opportunity of hearing before registration of F.I.R. to the police. It contemplates opportunity of hearing before proceeding for suspension or revocation of shop allotment and not for registration of F.I.R. 2. Section 2 (i a) of the Essential Commodities Act 1955 refers definition of Collector which includes Additional Collector and such other officers not below the rank of Sub-Divisional Officer and since in exercise of Full Judgment
TEJINDER PAL SINGH VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
FAROOQ DANDOO VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
OM PRAKASH DHANUKA Vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR
M/S. SUPREME BHIWANDI WADA MANOR INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
UMED SINGH VERSUS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR
Smt. Kantabai w/o Ashok Bhandari Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - Section 82 (4) of Criminal Procedure Code for declaring an accused as a proclaimed offender is identical to Section 82 (1) of the Code. The only difference is the penal provisions for the same as provided under s.174A of IPC. The general principle that Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as (2012) 8 SCC 73 lays down is that for the purposes of an anticipatory bail, a proclaimed offender also includes an offender or a proclaimed Full Judgment
Sonu @ Vikas Bhandari Versus The State of Madhya Pradesh
Law laid down - The order dated 12.05.2020 passed by the Gwalior Bench of this Court in the case of Balveer Singh Bundela v. State of Madhya Pradesh (Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.5621/2020) cannot be followed in the light of the subsequent order passed by the Division Bench of this court passed in the case of Arif Masood v. State of Madhya Pradesh passed in Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.45501/2020 dated 27.11.2020. Judgments referred to: (1) Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) reported as Full Judgment
Amit Dwivedi s/o Sheshmani Dwivedi vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
BHANU PRAKASH SINGH VERSUS STATE (G.N.C.T OF DELHI)
TUSHAR GARG; PULKIT GARG; AND SATISH GUPTA VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
NAVDEEP SINGH @ GAURAV VERSUS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
VISHESH JAIN VERSUS DEAPRTMENT OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
VIKAS MITTAL VERSUS STATE & ANR
AMRESH MISHRA VERSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
LUPITA SALUJA VERSUS DGGI AND ANR
Ankesh Gurjar @ Ankit Gurjar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Law Laid Down:- (1) The concept of arrest/apprehension in a police lockup/jail as contemplated by Chapter V of Cr.P.C. is not recognized in the Scheme of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. (2) The Juvenile as and when apprehended and detained is immediately sent to Observation Home/Fit facility/One-stop Home or any of the Institutions contemplated under 2015 Act either for the period of 24 hrs between arrest and production before the Board and also thereafter during pendency of Full Judgment