Judgments - Advertisement
Praveen Kumar Rajak & Ors Versus State of Chhattisgarh & Ors
South Eastern Central Railway Versus P. Gopal Naidu Krishna
THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS. VERSUS PRANJAL KUMAR SARMA & ORS.
ANURAG KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Vs. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ORS.
It is significant that the Rules refer to the recruitment year. It is a well-accepted principle of service law that only the number of vacancies that are advertised can be filled up. If the advertisement gives liberty to the Government to vary the number of posts, such power cannot be exercised for filling up future vacancies. If additional posts were created during the recruitment year i.e. Full Judgment
COMMON CAUSE Vs. UNION OF INDIA
23. The legitimate and permissible object of an advertisement, as earlier discussed, can always be achieved without publication of the photograph of any particular functionary either in the State of a political party. We are, therefore, of the view that in departure to the views of the Committee which recommended permissibility of publication of the photographs of the President and Prime Minister of the country and Governor or Chief Full Judgment